Construct validity and vulnerability to anxiety: A cognitive interviewing study of the revised Anxiety Sensitivity Index

被引:9
作者
Brown, Gary P. [1 ]
Hawkes, Nick C. [2 ]
Tata, Philip [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Holloway Univ London, Dept Psychol, Egham TW20 0EX, Surrey, England
[2] Enfield & Haringey Mental Hlth NHS Trust, Enfield, Middx, England
[3] Univ London, Cent & NW London Mental Hlth NHS Trust & Royal Ho, London WC1E 7HU, England
关键词
Anxiety; Vulnerability; Construct validity; Cognitive therapy; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE; DIMENSIONS; BELIEF; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.06.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI; Reiss, S., Peterson. R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the prediction of fearfulness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 1-8) is probably the most widely used measure of cognitive vulnerability to anxiety. However, there have been periodic doubts expressed about whether it measures beliefs about the negative consequences of anxiety symptoms, as it purports to, or actual anxiety experiences. The present study investigated the construct validity of the revised ASI using a cognitive interviewing approach. Sixteen outpatients with anxiety problems responded to ASI-R items and items from another measure of vulnerability to anxiety, the Anxiety Attitude and Belief Scale, while thinking aloud. The resulting verbal protocols were coded according to the apparent cognitive processes respondents engaged in when answering the items. Responses to the revised ASI-R more often entailed retrieval of past episodes of anxiety, and participants more frequently formulated their responses based on judgments of the occurrence or intensity of feelings rather than on the appraisal of anticipated consequences of what was described in the items. These findings potentially have significant implications for interpretation of results from the large body of literature using the different versions of the ASI. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:942 / 949
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Response latency as a signal to question problems in survey research [J].
Bassili, JN ;
Scott, BS .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1996, 60 (03) :390-399
[2]  
Beck A. T., 1985, Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective
[3]  
Beck AT., 1979, COGNITIVE THERAPY DE
[4]  
Bickart B., 1996, ANSWERING QUESTIONS, P115
[5]   The concept of validity [J].
Borsboom, D ;
Mellenbergh, GJ ;
van Heerden, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2004, 111 (04) :1061-1071
[6]  
Brown GP, 2000, CLIN PSYCHOL PSYCHOT, V7, P230, DOI 10.1002/1099-0879(200007)7:3<230::AID-CPP239>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-Y
[8]   Worry and the simulation of future outcomes [J].
Brown, GP ;
Macleod, AK ;
Tata, P ;
Goddard, L .
ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING, 2002, 15 (01) :1-17
[9]   Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide [J].
Chi, MTH .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 1997, 6 (03) :271-315
[10]  
CONRAD F, 1999, 1999 FED COMM STAT M