A step-wise approach to developing indicators to compare the performance of maternity units using hospital administrative data

被引:10
作者
Geary, R. S. [1 ,2 ]
Knight, H. E. [1 ,2 ]
Carroll, F. E. [2 ]
Gurol-Urganci, I. [1 ,2 ]
Morris, E. [2 ,3 ]
Cromwell, D. A. [1 ,4 ]
van der Meulen, J. H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, England
[2] Royal Coll Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, Lindsay Stewart Ctr Audit & Clin Informat, London, England
[3] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[4] Royal Coll Surgeons England, Clin Effectiveness Unit, London, England
关键词
Administrative data; hospital episode statistics; maternity statistics; performance indicators; CLINICAL GUIDELINES; QUALITY; ACCURACY; HEALTH; AUDIT; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.15013
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Hospital administrative data are attractive for comparing performance of maternity units because of their often large sample sizes, lack of selection bias and the relatively low costs of accessing these data compared with conducting primary data collection. However, using administrative data to develop indicators can also present challenges including varying data quality, the limited detail on clinical risk factors and a lack of structural and user experience measures. This review illustrates how to develop performance indicators for maternity units using hospital administrative data, including methods to address the challenges that administrative data pose.
引用
收藏
页码:857 / 865
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [31] A multidisciplinary audit of clinical coding accuracy in otolaryngology: financial, managerial and clinical governance considerations under payment-by-results
    Nouraei, S. A. R.
    O'Hanlon, S.
    Butler, C. R.
    Hadovsky, A.
    Donald, E.
    Benjamin, E.
    Sandhu, G. S.
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2009, 34 (01) : 43 - 51
  • [32] Pasternak D P, 1999, Qual Manag Health Care, V8, P47
  • [33] Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls
    Powell, AE
    Davies, HTO
    Thomson, RG
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 (02): : 122 - 128
  • [34] Determining obstetric patient safety indicators: the differences in neonatal outcome measures between different-sized delivery units
    Pyykonen, A.
    Gissler, M.
    Jakobsson, M.
    Petaja, J.
    Tapper, A-M
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 (04) : 430 - 436
  • [35] RCOG, 2013, PATT MAT CAR ENGL NH
  • [36] RCOG, 2016, PATT MAT CAR ENGL NH
  • [37] RCOG Women's Voices Involvement Panel, 2017, SECONDARY
  • [38] Measuring maternal morbidity in routinely collected health data - Development and validation of a maternal morbidity outcome indicator
    Roberts, Christine L.
    Cameron, Carolyn A.
    Bell, Jane C.
    Algert, Charles S.
    Morris, Jonathan M.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2008, 46 (08) : 786 - 794
  • [39] Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates
    Robson, MS
    Scudamore, IW
    Walsh, SM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 174 (01) : 199 - 205
  • [40] Socialstyrelsen, SWED MED BIRTH REG S