Effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway on the atrioventricular node

被引:0
作者
Enjoji, Y
Sugi, K
Kasao, M
Ikeda, T
Noro, M
Sakata, T
Yabuki, S
Yamaguchi, T
机构
来源
JAPANESE HEART JOURNAL | 1996年 / 37卷 / 04期
关键词
atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; atrioventricular nodal electrophysiology; radiofrequency catheter ablation; slow pathway; fast pathway; parasympathetic nerve;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Although the effective refractory period (ERP) of the fast pathway is reported to be shortened after radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), whether the atrioventricular (AV) nodal physiology maintains the same condition over the long term is controversial. To assess the AV nodal physiology after catheter ablation of the slow pathway in AVNRT, the A-H interval and ERP of the fast pathway were measured before, immediately after and 3 months after catheter ablation in 12 patients. We compared these factors in 12 patients with left concealed accessory bypass tract to clarify the mechanism of the electrophysiological change in the AV node. Both the A-H interval and ERP of the fast pathway were significantly shortened from 111 +/- 18 to 96 +/- 17 ms and 365 +/- 68 to 261 +/- 52 ms immediately after catheter ablation (p < 0.01), and recovered to 128 +/- 44 and 372 +/- 80 ms 3 months after catheter ablation. There were no significant differences in the A-H interval of the fast pathway between the period immediately after and 3 months after catheter ablation following administration of atropine sulfate (99 +/- 52). There were no significant differences in the ERP of the fast pathway between the period immediately after and 3 months after catheter ablation following administration of atropine sulfate (248 +/- 33 ms). On the contrary, there were no significant changes in the A-H interval and ERP of the AV node at these two times in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. The change in characteristics of AV nodal physiology was observed only immediately after catheter ablation in AVNRT, but not in WPW syndrome. The change in electrophysiology immediately after catheter ablation was similar to that following administration of atropine sulfate in AVNRT 3 months after catheter ablation. These findings suggest that catheter ablation does not cause a permanent change in AV nodal physiology and that the location of the ablated site plays an important role in AV nodal physiology.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 481
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The “Window” of Slow Pathway Conduction after Ablation and Recurrence of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
    Alan P. Wimmer
    Michael L. Shapiro
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2002, 6 : 51 - 57
  • [32] The "window" of slow pathway conduction after ablation and recurrence of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
    Wimmer, AP
    Shapiro, ML
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 6 (01) : 51 - 57
  • [33] RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION OF SINUS NODE REENTRANT TACHYCARDIA
    SPERRY, RE
    ELLENBOGEN, KA
    WOOD, MA
    BELZ, MK
    STAMBLER, BS
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 16 (11): : 2202 - 2209
  • [34] Persistence of single echo beat inducibility after selective ablation of the slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: Relationship to the functional properties of the atrioventricular node and clinical implications
    Tondo, C
    DellaBella, P
    Carbucicchio, C
    Riva, S
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 7 (08) : 689 - 696
  • [35] Patterns of accelerated junctional rhythm during slow pathway catheter ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: Temperature dependence, prognostic value, and insights into the nature of the slow pathway
    Wagshal, AB
    Crystal, E
    Katz, A
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (03) : 244 - 254
  • [36] Effects of Slow Pathway Ablation on Fast Pathway Function in Patients With Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia - Cryo- vs. Radiofrequency Ablation
    Park, Kyoung-Min
    Rhee, Kyoung-Suk
    Jin, Eun-Sun
    Nam, Gi-Byoung
    Choi, Kee-Joon
    Kim, You-Ho
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2012, 76 (05) : 1091 - 1096
  • [37] Ablation of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in a Patient with Reversal of Slow and Fast Pathways Inputs into the Atrioventricular Node
    Jia-Feng, Lin
    Yue-Chun, Li
    Peng-Lin, Yang
    Ji-Fei, Tang
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (01): : e17 - e19
  • [38] Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children: Effect of slow pathway ablation on fast pathway function
    Van Hare, GF
    Chiesa, NA
    Campbell, RM
    Kanter, RJ
    Cecchin, F
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (03) : 203 - 209
  • [39] ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODAL PHYSIOLOGY AFTER SLOW PATHWAY ABLATION
    TAKAHASHI, A
    IESAKA, Y
    IGAWA, M
    TOKUNAGA, T
    AMEMIYA, H
    FUJIWARA, H
    AONUMA, K
    NOGAMI, A
    HIROE, M
    MARUMO, F
    HIRAOKA, M
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 17 (11): : 2137 - 2142
  • [40] Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: Does the number of catheters matter?
    Mazur, Alexander
    Strasberg, Boris
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2006, 8 (07): : 497 - 498