Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Early Disability Pension in 198 Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients: Case-Control Study

被引:12
作者
Kaijankoski, Hanna [1 ,2 ]
Nissen, Mette [2 ,3 ]
Ikaeheimo, Tiina-Mari [2 ,3 ]
Zu Fraunberg, Mikael von Und [2 ,3 ]
Airaksinen, Olavi [1 ,2 ]
Huttunen, Jukka [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, KUH, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, Kuopio, Finland
[2] Univ Eastern Finland, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Inst Clin Med, Kuopio, Finland
[3] Univ Eastern Finland, KUH, Dept Neurosurg, Kuopio, Finland
关键词
Disability pension; Failed back surgery syndrome; FBSS; Rehabilitation subsidy; SCS; Sickness allowance; Spinal cord stimulation; CEREBRAL-BLOOD-FLOW; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; MULTICENTER; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1093/neuros/nyy530
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has proven to be a cost-effective treatment for failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). However, the effect on patients' working capability remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of SCS on working capability and to identify the factors behind permanent disability in FBSS patients. METHODS The study group consisted of 198 working-age patients with SCS trialed or implanted for FBSS in a single center between 1996 and 2014. For each patient, 3 living controls, matched by age, gender, and birthplace, were otherwise randomly selected by the Population Register Center. The data on working ability were obtained from the Social Insurance Institution. Patients were divided into 3 groups: SCS trial only, SCS implanted permanently, and SCS implanted but later explanted. RESULTS A rehabilitation subsidy was given to 68 patients and 8 controls for a mean of 5.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4-8.2) and 0.2 (95% CI 0.05-0.6) days per month (P<.05). At the end of follow-up, 16 (37%), 13 (33%), 25 (22%), and 27 (5%) subjects were on disability pension (DP) in the SCS trial, SCS explanted, SCS permanent, and control groups. Patients in the SCS trial-only group were significantly more often on DP than were patients with permanent SCS (odds ratio 2.6; 95% CI 1.2-5.9; P=.02) CONCLUSION Permanent SCS usage was associated with reduced sick leave and DP. Prospective study will be required to assess possible predictive value.
引用
收藏
页码:1225 / 1232
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Systematic Review of the (Cost-)effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation for People With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
    Bala, Malgorzata M.
    Riemsma, Robert P.
    Nixon, John
    Kleijnen, Jos
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2008, 24 (09) : 741 - 756
  • [2] Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment
    Breivik, H
    Collett, B
    Ventafridda, V
    Cohen, R
    Gallacher, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2006, 10 (04) : 287 - 333
  • [3] Neuromodulation of Vegetative State through Spinal Cord Stimulation: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?
    Della Pepa, Giuseppe Maria
    Fukaya, Chikashi
    La Rocca, Giuseppe
    Zhong, Jun
    Visocchi, Massimiliano
    [J]. STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 91 (05) : 275 - 287
  • [4] Farber SH, 2017, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V20, pE796
  • [5] Finnish Centre for Pensions (Elaketurvakeskus), FINN CTR PENS STAT D
  • [6] Screening of neuropathic pain components in patients with chronic back pain associated with nerve root compression:: a prospective observational pilot study (MIPORT)
    Freynhagen, R
    Baron, R
    Tölle, T
    Stemmler, E
    Gockel, U
    Stevens, M
    Maier, C
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2006, 22 (03) : 529 - 537
  • [7] Spinal Cord Stimulation: An Alternative Concept of Rehabilitation?
    Giugno, Antonella
    Guli, Carlo
    Basile, Luigi
    Graziano, Francesca
    Maugeri, Rosario
    Visocchi, Massimiliano
    Iacopino, Domenico Gerardo
    [J]. TRENDS IN RECONSTRUCTIVE NEUROSURGERY: NEUROREHABILITATION, RESTORATION AND RECONSTRUCTION, 2017, 124 : 15 - 18
  • [8] NeuPSIG guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment
    Haanpaa, Maija
    Attal, Nadine
    Backonja, Miroslav
    Baron, Ralf
    Bennett, Michael
    Bouhassira, Didier
    Cruccu, Giorgio
    Hansson, Per
    Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A.
    Iannetti, Gian Domenico
    Jensen, Troels S.
    Kauppila, Timo
    Nurmikko, Turo J.
    Rice, Andew S. C.
    Rowbotham, Michael
    Serra, Jordi
    Sommer, Claudia
    Smith, Blair H.
    Treede, Rolf-Detlef
    [J]. PAIN, 2011, 152 (01) : 14 - 27
  • [9] Spinal cord stimulation vs. conventional medical management: A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of patients with failed back surgery syndrome (PROCESS study)
    Kumar, K
    North, R
    Taylor, R
    Sculpher, M
    Van den Abeele, C
    Gehring, M
    Jacques, L
    Eldabe, S
    Meglio, M
    Molet, J
    Thomson, S
    O'Callaghan, J
    Eisenberg, E
    Milbouw, G
    Fortini, G
    Richardson, J
    Buchser, E
    Tracey, S
    Reny, P
    Brookes, M
    Sabene, S
    Cano, P
    Banks, C
    Pengelly, L
    Adler, R
    Leruth, S
    Kelly, C
    Jacobs, M
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2005, 8 (04): : 213 - 218
  • [10] Treatment of chronic pain with spinal cord stimulation versus alternative therapies: Cost-effectiveness analysis
    Kumar, K
    Malik, S
    Demeria, D
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (01) : 106 - 115