Computing graph edit distance on quantum devices

被引:5
作者
Incudini, Massimiliano [1 ]
Tarocco, Fabio [1 ]
Mengoni, Riccardo [2 ]
Di Pierro, Alessandra [1 ]
Mandarino, Antonio [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Dipartimento Informat, I-34137 Verona, Italy
[2] Int Ctr Theory Quantum Technol, CINECA, I-40033 Casalecchio Di Reno, Italy
[3] Univ Gdansk, Int Ctr Theory Quantum Technol, PL-80309 Gdansk, Poland
关键词
Graph edit distance; Quantum annealing; Variational quantum algorithms; OPTIMIZATION; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1007/s42484-022-00077-x
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Distance measures provide the foundation for many popular algorithms in Machine Learning and Pattern Recognition. Different notions of distance can be used depending on the types of the data the algorithm is working on. For graph-shaped data, an important notion is the Graph Edit Distance (GED) that measures the degree of (dis)similarity between two graphs in terms of the operations needed to make them identical. As the complexity of computing GED is the same as NP-hard problems, it is reasonable to consider approximate solutions. In this paper, we present a QUBO formulation of the GED problem. This allows us to implement two different approaches, namely quantum annealing and variational quantum algorithms, that run on the two types of quantum hardware currently available: quantum annealer and gate-based quantum computer, respectively. Considering the current state of noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers, we base our study on proof-of-principle tests of their performance.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] The power of quantum neural networks
    Abbas, Amira
    Sutter, David
    Zoufal, Christa
    Lucchi, Aurelien
    Figalli, Alessio
    Woerner, Stefan
    [J]. NATURE COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2021, 1 (06): : 403 - 409
  • [2] Abu-Aisheh Zeina, 2015, 4th International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods (ICPRAM 2015). Proceedings, P271
  • [3] Adiabatic quantum computation
    Albash, Tameem
    Lidar, Daniel A.
    [J]. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2018, 90 (01)
  • [4] Quantum Computer Systems for Scientific Discovery
    Alexeev, Yuri
    Bacon, Dave
    Brown, Kenneth R.
    Calderbank, Robert
    Carr, Lincoln D.
    Chong, Frederic T.
    DeMarco, Brian
    Englund, Dirk
    Farhi, Edward
    Fefferman, Bill
    Gorshkov, Alexey, V
    Houck, Andrew
    Kim, Jungsang
    Kimmel, Shelby
    Lange, Michael
    Lloyd, Seth
    Lukin, Mikhail D.
    Maslov, Dmitri
    Maunz, Peter
    Monroe, Christopher
    Preskill, John
    Roetteler, Martin
    Savage, Martin J.
    Thompson, Jeff
    [J]. PRX QUANTUM, 2021, 2 (01):
  • [5] A LINEAR-PROGRAMMING APPROACH FOR THE WEIGHTED GRAPH MATCHING PROBLEM
    ALMOHAMAD, HA
    DUFFUAA, SO
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1993, 15 (05) : 522 - 525
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2007, BRIDGING GAP GRAPH E
  • [7] QUANTUM STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION
    APOLLONI, B
    CARVALHO, C
    DEFALCO, D
    [J]. STOCHASTIC PROCESSES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, 1989, 33 (02) : 233 - 244
  • [8] Physics-Inspired Optimization for Quadratic Unconstrained Problems Using a Digital Annealer
    Aramon, Maliheh
    Rosenberg, Gili
    Valiante, Elisabetta
    Miyazawa, Toshiyuki
    Tamura, Hirotaka
    Katzgraber, Helmut G.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2019, 7 (APR):
  • [9] Accuracy and minor embedding in subqubo decomposition with fully connected large problems: a case study about the number partitioning problem
    Asproni, Luca
    Caputo, Davide
    Silva, Blanca
    Fazzi, Giovanni
    Magagnini, Marco
    [J]. QUANTUM MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 2 (01)
  • [10] Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time [Extended Abstract]
    Babai, Laszlo
    [J]. STOC'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 48TH ANNUAL ACM SIGACT SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, 2016, : 684 - 697