First and second trimester screening for fetal structural anomalies

被引:107
作者
Edwards, Lindsay [1 ]
Hui, Lisa [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Hobart Hosp, Fetomaternal Unit, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[3] Mercy Hosp Women, Dept Perinatal Med, Level 3,163 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Vic 3084, Australia
[4] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Publ Hlth Genet Grp, Parkville, Vic, Australia
关键词
Congenital anomalies; Prenatal diagnosis; Ultrasonography; Neurosonography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Nuchal translucency measurement; CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM; INCREASED NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; ROUTINE ULTRASOUND; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; NASAL BONE; ABNORMALITIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.005
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Fetal structural anomalies are found in up to 3% of all pregnancies and ultrasound-based screening has been an integral part of routine prenatal care for decades. The prenatal detection of fetal anomalies allows for optimal perinatal management, providing expectant parents with opportunities for additional imaging, genetic testing, and the provision of information regarding prognosis and management options. Approximately one-half of all major structural anomalies can now be detected in the first trimester, including acrania/anencephaly, abdominal wall defects, holoprosencephaly and cystic hygromata. Due to the ongoing development of some organ systems however, some anomalies will not be evident until later in the pregnancy. To this extent, the second trimester anatomy is recommended by professional societies as the standard investigation for the detection of fetal structural anomalies. The reported detection rates of structural anomalies vary according to the organ system being examined, and are also dependent upon factors such as the equipment settings and sonographer experience. Technological advances over the past two decades continue to support the role of ultrasound as the primary imaging modality in pregnancy, and the safety of ultrasound for the developing fetus is well established. With increasing capabilities and experience, detailed examination of the central nervous system and cardiovascular system is possible, with dedicated examinations such as the fetal neurosonogram and the fetal echocardiogram now widely performed in tertiary centers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well recognized for its role in the assessment of fetal brain anomalies; other potential indications for fetal MRI include lung volume measurement (in cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia), and pre-surgical planning prior to fetal spina bifida repair. When a major structural abnormality is detected prenatally, genetic testing with chromosomal microarray is recommended over routine karyotype due to its higher genomic resolution. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 111
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [11] Association of Copy Number Variants With Specific Ultrasonographically Detected Fetal Anomalies
    Donnelly, Jennifer C.
    Platt, Lawrence D.
    Rebarber, Andrei
    Zachary, Julia
    Grobman, William A.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 124 (01) : 83 - 90
  • [12] 13-14-week fetal anatomy scan: a 5-year prospective study
    Ebrashy, A.
    El Kateb, A.
    Momtaz, M.
    El Sheikhah, A.
    Aboulghar, M. M.
    Ibrahim, M.
    Saad, M.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 35 (03) : 292 - 296
  • [13] Evaluation of Prenatally Diagnosed Structural Congenital Anomalies
    Gagnon, Alain
    Wilson, R. Douglas
    Allen, Victoria M.
    Audibert, Francois
    Blight, Claire
    Brock, Jo-Ann
    Desilets, Valerie A.
    Gagnon, Alain
    Johnson, Jo-Ann
    Langlois, Sylvie
    Murphy-Kaulbeck, Lynn
    Wyatt, Philip
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2009, 31 (09) : 875 - 881
  • [14] Incidence of major structural cardiac defects associated with increased nuchal translucency but normal karyotype
    Ghi, T
    Huggon, IC
    Zosmer, N
    Nicolaides, KH
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 18 (06) : 610 - 614
  • [15] Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of fetal anomalies: a blinded case-control study
    Goncalves, L. F.
    Lee, W.
    Mody, S.
    Shetty, A.
    Sangi-Haghpeykar, H.
    Romero, R.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 48 (02) : 185 - 192
  • [16] First-trimester detection of structural abnormalities and the role of aneuploidy markers
    Grande, M.
    Arigita, M.
    Borobio, V.
    Jimenez, J. M.
    Fernandez, S.
    Borrell, A.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 39 (02) : 157 - 163
  • [17] The performance of routine ultrasonographic screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus Study
    Grandjean, H
    Larroque, D
    Levi, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (02) : 446 - 454
  • [18] HGSA/RANZCOG Joint Committee on Prenatal Diagnosis and Screening, 2015, PREN ASS FET STRUCT
  • [19] Population-based impact of noninvasive prenatal screening on screening and diagnostic testing for fetal aneuploidy
    Hui, Lisa
    Hutchinson, Briohny
    Poulton, Alice
    Halliday, Jane
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 19 (12) : 1338 - 1345
  • [20] Improved detection rate of structural abnormalities in the first trimester using an extended examination protocol
    Iliescu, D.
    Tudorache, S.
    Comanescu, A.
    Antsaklis, P.
    Cotarcea, S.
    Novac, L.
    Cernea, N.
    Antsaklis, A.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 42 (03) : 300 - 309