Efficacy of lidocaine versus mepivacaine in the management of myofascial pain

被引:3
作者
Albagieh, Hamad [1 ]
Aloyouny, Ashwag [2 ]
Alshehri, Nojoud [3 ]
Alsammahi, Noor [4 ]
Almutrafi, Dima [5 ]
Hadlaq, Emad [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Oral Med & Diagnost Sci Dept, Coll Dent, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman Univ, Coll Dent, Basic Dent Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Saud Univ, Restorat Dept, Coll Dent, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Clin Dent Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] Prince Sultan Mil Med City, Dent Clin, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Randomized controlled trial; Myofascial pain; Trigger points; Mepivacaine; Lidocaine; TRIGGER POINTS; INJECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsps.2020.08.014
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objectives: There are many treatment modalities for myofascial pain, and recent findings reported in the literature highlight the superiority of using local anesthetics as the treatment of choice. The objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of two of the most used local anesthetic agents-lidocaine and mepivacaine-in the management of myofascial pain. Materials and methods: Thirty patients (20 females, 10 males) were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 50% received lidocaine and 50% received mepivacaine. Trigger point injections in the orofacial region were administered 4 times, 10 days between each injection, with 4 weeks of follow-up after the end of the treatment course. Pain levels were recorded using a visual analog scale (VAS) at the time of follow-up and 30 min after injection. Results: All patients exhibited statistically significant improvement when comparing pre- and post-treatment mean values. Both local anesthetics (i.e., lidocaine and mepivacaine) were similarly effective for the management of myofascial pain (p = 0.875). The mepivacaine-treated group exhibited significantly lower post-injection tenderness than the lidocaine group (p = 0.038). There was no relationship between sex and treatment response. Female and male patients both reported similar responses in terms of VAS scores (p = 0.818). Conclusion: No drug was superior in the long term; thus, the clinician's choice can be based on drug availability and patient medical history. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.
引用
收藏
页码:1238 / 1242
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   LOCAL ANAESTHETICS .1. N-ALKYL PYRROLIDINE AND N-ALKYL PIPERIDINE CARBOXYLIC ACID AMIDES [J].
AFEKENSTAM, B ;
EGNER, B ;
PETTERSSON, G .
ACTA CHEMICA SCANDINAVICA, 1957, 11 (07) :1183-1190
[2]   A Comparison of The Effects of Lidocaine and Saline Injection on Pain, Disability, and Shear-Wave Elastography Findings in Patients with Myofascial Trigger Points [J].
Analan, Pinar Doruk ;
Aslan, Hulya ;
Umay, Sermin Tok .
CYPRUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 4 (02) :103-109
[3]   Comparison of injection methods in myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Ay, Saime ;
Evcik, Deniz ;
Tur, Birkan Sonel .
CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 29 (01) :19-23
[4]  
Brockmann William G., 2014, General Dentistry, V62, P70
[5]   Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with Myofascial Pain Syndrome [J].
Celiker, Reyhan ;
Atalay, Ayce ;
Guven, Zeynep .
CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2010, 14 (05) :361-366
[6]   Fibromyalgia A Clinical Review [J].
Clauw, Daniel J. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (15) :1547-1555
[7]   Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey [J].
Fleckenstein, Johannes ;
Zaps, Daniela ;
Rueger, Linda J. ;
Lehmeyer, Lukas ;
Freiberg, Florentina ;
Lang, Philip M. ;
Irnich, Dominik .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2010, 11
[8]  
Food and Drug Administration, 2010, XYL LID HCL
[9]  
Food and Drug Administration, 2015, CARB MEP HCL
[10]  
FROST FA, 1980, LANCET, V1, P499