Multi-objective single product robust optimization: An integrated design and marketing approach

被引:64
作者
Besharati, B.
Luo, L.
Azarm, S. [1 ]
Kannan, P. K.
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, AJ Clark Sch Engn, Dept Engn Mech, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Dept Mkt, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, AJ Clark Sch Engn, Dept Engn Mech, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Robert H Smith Sch Business, Dept Mkt, College Pk, MD USA
关键词
robust design; integration of design and marketing; multi-objective optimization; SEGMENTATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1115/1.2202889
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
We present an integrated design and marketing approach to facilitate the generation of an optimal robust set of product design alternatives to carry forward to the prototyping stage. The approach considers variability in both (i) engineering design domain, and (ii) customer preferences in marketing domain. In the design domain, the approach evaluates performance and robustness of a design alternative due to variations in its uncontrollable parameters. In the marketing domain, in addition to considering competitive product offerings, the approach considers designs that are robust in customer preferences with respect to: (1) the variations in the design domain, and (2) the inherent variations in the estimates of preferences given the fit of the preference model to the sampled data. Our overall goal is to obtain design alternatives that are multi-objectively robust and optimal, i.e., (1) are optimal for nominal values of parameters, and (2) are within a known acceptable range in their multi-objective performance, and (3) maintain feasibility even when they are subject to applications and environments that are different from nominal or standard laboratory conditions. We illustrate the highlights of our approach with the design of a corded power tool example.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 892
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Akaike H., 1973, 2 INT S INFORM THEOR, P267, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15
[2]  
Ben-Akiva M., 1985, DISCRETE CHOICE ANAL
[3]  
BESHARATI B, 2005, IN PRESS DECISION SU
[4]  
BESHARATI B, 2004, P ASME DETC 04 DES A
[5]  
Camerer C., 1995, HDB EXPT EC
[6]   PSYCHOMETRIC METHODS IN MARKETING-RESEARCH .1. CONJOINT-ANALYSIS [J].
CARROLL, JD ;
GREEN, PE .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1995, 32 (04) :385-391
[7]   A probabilistic-based design model for achieving flexibility in design [J].
Chen, W ;
Yuan, C .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1999, 121 (01) :77-83
[8]  
Chen W., 1996, ASME J MECH DESIGN, V118, P478
[9]  
DU S, 2004, ASME, V126, P562
[10]  
FUHITA K, 1997, P ASME DETC 97 23 DE