Tonometers-which one should I use?

被引:28
作者
Aziz, Kanza [1 ]
Friedman, David S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Wilmer Eye Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER; DYNAMIC CONTOUR TONOMETRY; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRO REBOUND TONOMETER; TONO-PEN; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; NONCONTACT TONOMETRY; CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1038/s41433-018-0040-4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Although several factors are known to play a role in the development and progression of glaucoma, intraocular pressure (IOP) remains the only modifiable risk factor. Medical and surgical treatments for glaucoma both aim to reduce IOP to minimize disease progression. Tonometry is therefore an essential element of the ophthalmological exam. There are several types of tonometers available currently. These range from well-established instruments that have been in clinical use for decades to new devices, which are the result of recent technological advances. The various instruments have advantages and disadvantages that affect their suitability for a given setting, purpose, and patient population. In this review, we aim to describe the most commonly available tonometers today along with their advantages, disadvantages, and applicability.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 937
页数:7
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Ademola-Popoola D S, 2014, J West Afr Coll Surg, V4, P17
[2]   Dynamic ultra high speed Scheimpflug imaging for assessing corneal biomechanical properties [J].
Ambrosio, Renato, Jr. ;
Ramos, Isaac ;
Luz, Allan ;
Faria, Fernando Correa ;
Steinmueller, Andreas ;
Krug, Matthias ;
Belin, Michael W. ;
Roberts, Cynthia Jane .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2013, 72 (02) :99-102
[3]   Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes [J].
Annette, Hager ;
Kristina, Loge ;
Bernd, Schroeder ;
Mark-Oliver, Fuellhas ;
Wolfgang, Wiegand .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2008, 17 (05) :361-365
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1967, Arch Ophthalmol, V77, P305
[5]   Applanation tonometry: a comparison of the Perkins handheld and Goldmann slit lamp-mounted methods [J].
Arora, R. ;
Bellamy, H. ;
Austin, M. W. .
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 8 :605-610
[6]   Does Rebound Tonometry Probe Misalignment Modify Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Human Eyes? [J].
Beasley, Ian G. ;
Laughton, Deborah S. ;
Coldrick, Benjamin J. ;
Drew, Thomas E. ;
Sallah, Marium ;
Davies, Leon N. .
JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 2013
[7]   Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: challenging the gold standard [J].
Bochmann, Frank ;
Kaufmann, Claude ;
Thiel, Michael A. .
EXPERT REVIEW OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 5 (06) :743-749
[8]   Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements [J].
Boehm, Andreas G. ;
Weber, Anja ;
Pillunat, Lutz E. ;
Koch, Rainer ;
Spoerl, Eberhard .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2008, 49 (06) :2472-2477
[9]   Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients [J].
Brusini, P ;
Salvetat, ML ;
Zeppieri, M ;
Tosoni, C ;
Parisi, L .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2006, 15 (03) :213-217
[10]  
Cordero Ismael, 2014, Community Eye Health, V27, P57