Testing effort dependent software reliability model for imperfect debugging process considering both detection and correction

被引:80
作者
Peng, R. [1 ]
Li, Y. F. [2 ]
Zhang, W. J. [3 ]
Hu, Q. P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Dongling Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Ecole Centrale Paris SUPELEC, Paris, France
[3] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Acad Math & Syst Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Software reliability; Fault detection process; Fault correction process; Testing effort function; Imperfect debugging; FAULT-DETECTION; GROWTH-MODELS; CHANGE-POINT; RELEASE; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2014.01.004
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper studies the fault detection process (FDP) and fault correction process (FCP) with the incorporation of testing effort function and imperfect debugging. In order to ensure high reliability, it is essential for software to undergo a testing phase, during which faults can be detected and corrected by debuggers. The testing resource allocation during this phase, which is usually depicted by the testing effort function, considerably influences not only the fault detection rate but also the time to correct a detected fault. In addition, testing is usually far from perfect such that new faults may be introduced. In this paper, we first show how to incorporate testing effort function and fault introduction into FDP and then develop FCP as delayed FDP with a correction effort. Various specific paired FDP and FCP models are obtained based on different assumptions of fault introduction and correction effort. An illustrative example is presented. The optimal release policy under different criteria is also discussed. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 43
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Optimal times for software release when repair is imperfect [J].
Boland, Philip J. ;
Chuiv, Nora Ni .
STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 2007, 77 (12) :1176-1184
[2]   Mathematical modeling of software reliability testing with imperfect debugging [J].
Cai, Kai-Yuan ;
Cao, Ping ;
Dong, Zhao ;
Liu, Ke .
COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 59 (10) :3245-3285
[3]   A generalized JM model with applications to imperfect debugging in software reliability [J].
Chang, Yen-Chang ;
Liu, Ching-Ti .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2009, 33 (09) :3578-3588
[4]   A study of software reliability growth from the perspective of learning effects [J].
Chiu, Kuei-Chen ;
Huang, Yeu-Shiang ;
Lee, Tzai-Zang .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (10) :1410-1421
[5]  
Demarko T, 1982, CONTROLLING SOFTWARE
[6]   Incorporating fault debugging activities into software reliability models: A simulation approach [J].
Gokhale, Swapna S. ;
Lyu, Michael R. ;
Trivedi, Kishor S. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2006, 55 (02) :281-292
[7]   Robust recurrent neural network modeling for software fault detection and correction prediction [J].
Hu, Q. P. ;
Xie, M. ;
Ng, S. H. ;
Levitin, G. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2007, 92 (03) :332-340
[8]   Performance analysis of software reliability growth models with testing-efrort and change-point [J].
Huang, CY .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2005, 76 (02) :181-194
[9]   Analysis of incorporating logistic testing-effort function into software reliability modeling [J].
Huang, CY ;
Kuo, SY .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2002, 51 (03) :261-270
[10]   Quasi-Renewal Time-Delay Fault-Removal Consideration in Software Reliability Modeling [J].
Hwang, Seheon ;
Pham, Hoang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2009, 39 (01) :200-209