Automated and electronically assisted hand hygiene monitoring systems: A systematic review

被引:112
作者
Ward, Melissa A. [1 ]
Schweizer, Marin L. [1 ,2 ]
Polgreen, Philip M. [1 ]
Gupta, Kalpana [3 ,4 ]
Reisinger, Heather S. [1 ,2 ]
Perencevich, Eli N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Iowa City VA Hlth Care Syst, Iowa City, IA 52246 USA
[3] VA Boston Hlth Care Syst, West Roxbury, MA USA
[4] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Jamaica Plain, MA USA
关键词
Hand hygiene; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; HEALTH-CARE; INFECTION PREVENTION; SURVEILLANCE; ALCOHOL; DEVICE; ADHERENCE; FEEDBACK; WORKERS; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajic.2014.01.002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Hand hygiene is one of the most effective ways to prevent transmission of health care-associated infections. Electronic systems and tools are being developed to enhance hand hygiene compliance monitoring. Our systematic review assesses the existing evidence surrounding the adoption and accuracy of automated systems or electronically enhanced direct observations and also reviews the effectiveness of such systems in health care settings. Methods: We systematically reviewed PubMed for articles published between January 1, 2000, and March 31, 2013, containing the terms hand AND hygiene or hand AND disinfection or handwashing. Resulting articles were reviewed to determine if an electronic system was used. Results: We identified 42 articles for inclusion. Four types of systems were identified: electronically assisted/ enhanced direct observation, video-monitored direct observation systems, electronic dispenser counters, and automated hand hygiene monitoring networks. Fewer than 20% of articles identified included calculations for efficiency or accuracy. Conclusions: Limited data are currently available to recommend adoption of specific automatic or electronically assisted hand hygiene surveillance systems. Future studies should be undertaken that assess the accuracy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of such systems. Given the restricted clinical and infection prevention budgets of most facilities, cost-effectiveness analysis of specific systems will be required before these systems are widely adopted. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 478
页数:7
相关论文
共 66 条
[61]   COMMENTARY Quicker, Easier, and Cheaper? The Promise of Automated Hand Hygiene Monitoring [J].
Stewardson, Andrew ;
Pittet, Didier .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 32 (10) :1029-1031
[62]   Isolation status and voice prompts improve hand hygiene [J].
Swoboda, Sandra M. ;
Earsing, Karen ;
Strauss, Kevin ;
Lane, Stephen ;
Lipsett, Pamela A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2007, 35 (07) :470-476
[63]   Electronic monitoring and voice prompts improve hand hygiene and decrease nosocomial infections in an intermediate care unit [J].
Swoboda, SM ;
Earsing, K ;
Strauss, K ;
Lane, S ;
Lipsett, PA .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (02) :358-363
[64]  
Thomas Kadesha, 2010, Hosp Health Netw, V84, P17
[65]   Use of electronic alerts to enhance hand hygiene compliance and decrease transmission of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in a hematology unit [J].
Venkatesh, Arjun K. ;
Lankford, Mary G. ;
Rooney, Denise M. ;
Blachford, Todd ;
Watts, Charles M. ;
Noskin, Gary A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2008, 36 (03) :199-205
[66]   Three successful interventions in health care workers that improve compliance with hand hygiene: Is sustained replication possible? [J].
Whitby, Michael ;
McLaws, Mary-Louise ;
Slater, Karen ;
Tong, Edward ;
Johnson, Barbara .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2008, 36 (05) :349-355