Intercomparison of the Gulf Stream in ocean reanalyses: 1993-2010

被引:23
作者
Chi, Lequan [1 ]
Wolfe, Christopher L. P. [1 ]
Hameed, Sultan [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Sch Marine & Atmospher Sci, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
North Atlantic Ocean; Gulf Stream; Ocean reanalysis; Intercomparison; NORTH-ATLANTIC CIRCULATION; WESTERN BOUNDARY CURRENT; DATA ASSIMILATION; IN-SITU; VARIABILITY; RESOLUTION; EXCHANGE; TEMPERATURE; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocemod.2018.02.008
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
In recent years, significant progress has been made in the development of high-resolution ocean reanalysis products. This paper compares aspects of the Gulf Stream (GS) from the Florida Straits to south of the Grand Banks-particularly Florida Strait transport, separation of the GS near Cape Hatteras, GS properties along the Oleander Line (from New Jersey to Bermuda), GS path, and the GS north wall positions-in 13 widely used global reanalysis products of various resolutions, including two unconstrained products. A large spread across reanalysis products is found. HYCOM and GLORYS2v4 stand out for their superior performance by most metrics. Some common biases are found in all discussed models; for example, the velocity structure of the GS near the Oleander Line is too symmetrical and the maximum velocity is too weak compared with observations. Less than half of the reanalysis products show significant correlations (at the 95% confidence level) with observations for the GS separation latitude at Cape Hatteras, the GS transport, and net transport across Oleander Line. The cross-stream velocity structure is further discussed by a theoretical model idealizing GS as a smoothed PV front.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:21
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Allard R., 2013, P EGU GEN ASS C VIEN, P7
[2]   On the recent destabilization of the Gulf Stream path downstream of Cape Hatteras [J].
Andres, M. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 43 (18) :9836-9842
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 8 S INTEGRATED OBSER
[4]  
Armour KC, 2016, NAT GEOSCI, V9, P549, DOI [10.1038/ngeo2731, 10.1038/NGEO2731]
[5]   The Ocean Reanalyses Intercomparison Project (ORA-IP) [J].
Balmaseda, M. A. ;
Hernandez, F. ;
Storto, A. ;
Palmer, M. D. ;
Alves, O. ;
Shi, L. ;
Smith, G. C. ;
Toyoda, T. ;
Valdivieso, M. ;
Barnier, B. ;
Behringer, D. ;
Boyer, T. ;
Chang, Y-S. ;
Chepurin, G. A. ;
Ferry, N. ;
Forget, G. ;
Fujii, Y. ;
Good, S. ;
Guinehut, S. ;
Haines, K. ;
Ishikawa, Y. ;
Keeley, S. ;
Koehl, A. ;
Lee, T. ;
Martin, M. J. ;
Masina, S. ;
Masuda, S. ;
Meyssignac, B. ;
Mogensen, K. ;
Parent, L. ;
Peterson, K. A. ;
Tang, Y. M. ;
Yin, Y. ;
Vernieres, G. ;
Wang, X. ;
Waters, J. ;
Wedd, R. ;
Wang, O. ;
Xue, Y. ;
Chevallier, M. ;
Lemieux, J-F. ;
Dupont, F. ;
Kuragano, T. ;
Kamachi, M. ;
Awaji, T. ;
Caltabiano, A. ;
Wilmer-Becker, K. ;
Gaillard, F. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHY, 2015, 8 :S80-S97
[6]   An oceanic general circulation model framed in hybrid isopycnic-Cartesian coordinates [J].
Bleck, Rainer .
OCEAN MODELLING, 2002, 4 (01) :55-88
[7]  
BOWER AS, 1994, J PHYS OCEANOGR, V24, P1399, DOI 10.1175/1520-0485(1994)024<1399:ACLAPE>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]  
BOWER AS, 1985, J PHYS OCEANOGR, V15, P24, DOI 10.1175/1520-0485(1985)015<0024:TGSOB>2.0.CO
[10]  
2