Environmental sustainability assessment of food waste valorization options

被引:149
作者
Vandermeersch, T. [1 ,2 ]
Alvarenga, R. A. F. [1 ]
Ragaert, P. [2 ]
Dewulf, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Fac Biosci Engn, Res Grp Envoc, Dept Sustainable Organ Chem & Technol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Fac Biosci Engn, Dept Food Safety & Food Qual, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Food waste; Bread waste; Waste valorization; Exergy; LCA; Environmental sustainability; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENERGY DEMAND; RESOURCE; EXERGY; TECHNOLOGY; PRODUCTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.03.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Food waste can be valorized through different technologies, such as anaerobic digestion, incineration, and animal feed production. In this study we analyzed the environmental performance of two food waste valorization scenarios from a company of the retail sector in Belgium, through exergy analysis, exergetic life cycle assessment (ELCA), and a traditional life cycle assessment (LCA). In scenario 1 all food waste was considered to be valorized in an anaerobic digestion (producing electricity, heat, digestate and sorting the packaging material to be used as fuel for cement industry), while in scenario 2 a bread fraction was valorized to produce animal feed and a non-bread fraction was valorized in an anaerobic digestion (producing the same products on scenario I, but in lower amounts). Scenario 2 was 10% more efficient than scenario 1 in the exergy analysis. For the ELCA and the single score LCA, scenario 2 presented lower environmental impacts than scenario 1 (32% and 26% lower, respectively). These results were mainly due to the avoided products from traditional supply chain (animal feed produced from agricultural products) and lower exergy loss at the feed production plant. Nevertheless, the high dry matter content of the bread waste played an important role on these results, therefore it should be pointed out that valorizing food waste to animal feed seems to be a better option only for the fractions of food waste with low water content (as bread waste). (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 64
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Exergy-based accounting for land as a natural resource in life cycle assessment [J].
Alvarenga, Rodrigo A. F. ;
Dewulf, Jo ;
Van Langenhove, Herman ;
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (05) :939-947
[2]  
[Anonymous], RECIPE 2008 LIFE CYC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, OFFICIAL J EUROPEA L, V312, p22.11
[4]  
[Anonymous], VERLIES VERSPILLING
[5]   Life Cycle Impact Assessment Workshop Summary Midpoints versus Endpoints: The Sacrifices and Benefits [J].
Bare, Jane C. ;
Hofstetter, Patrick ;
Pennington, David W. ;
de Haes, Helias A. Udo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2000, 5 (06) :319-326
[6]   Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration [J].
Cherubini, Francesco ;
Bargigli, Silvia ;
Ulgiati, Sergio .
ENERGY, 2009, 34 (12) :2116-2123
[7]   Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of four alternatives for using by-products of cane sugar production [J].
Contreras, Ana M. ;
Rosa, Elena ;
Perez, Maylier ;
Van Langenhove, Herman ;
Dewulf, Jo .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2009, 17 (08) :772-779
[8]   The environmental sustainability of anaerobic digestion as a biomass valorization technology [J].
De Meester, Steven ;
Demeyer, Jens ;
Velghe, Filip ;
Peene, Andy ;
Van Langenhove, Herman ;
Dewulf, Jo .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 121 :396-403
[9]   Cumulative exergy extraction from the natural environment (CEENE):: a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment method for resource accounting [J].
Dewulf, J. ;
Boesch, M. E. ;
De Meester, B. ;
Van der Vorst, G. ;
Van Langenhove, H. ;
Hellweg, S. ;
Huijbregts, M. A. J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (24) :8477-8483
[10]  
Dewulf J., 2006, Renewables-Based Technology: Sustainability Assessment - Chapter 7: Exergy, P354