Differences in creativity across Art and STEM students: We are more alike than unalike

被引:23
作者
van Broekhoven, Kim [1 ]
Cropley, David [2 ]
Seegers, Philipp [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Res Ctr Educ & Labour Market, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ South Australia, UniSA STEM, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Maastricht Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Candidate Select GmbH CASE, Cologne, Germany
关键词
Creativity; Art; Science; Engineering; Amusement park theory; PERSONALITY-CHARACTERISTICS; SELF-EFFICACY; MODEL; AESTHETICS; BUSINESS; FUTURE; BIG;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100707
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of the present research is to investigate creativity differences, and the magnitude and nature of those differences, among university students. More specifically, we examined differences in creativity within and between: (a) General Thematic Areas (Art and Science); (b) Specific Science domains (STEM), and; (c) Engineering micro-domains, for a total of 2277 students in German tertiary institutions. The results showed many statistically significant, but uniformly small, differences at all levels, across a range of Person, Process and Product variables. The pattern of results suggests that Openness, Creative Self-Efficacy and Divergent Thinking may be general pre-requisites for creativity. In contrast, the way that characteristics of creative products (e.g. originality) are perceived appears more complex. This research sheds additional light on long-standing debates regarding domain-generality/specificity and creativity.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Resisting Classical Solutions: The Creative Mind of Industrial Designers and Engineers [J].
Agogue, Marine ;
Le Masson, Pascal ;
Dalmasso, Cedric ;
Houde, Olivier ;
Cassotti, Mathieu .
PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, 2015, 9 (03) :313-318
[2]  
Amabile T.M., 1996, Creativity in context: The social psychology of creativity
[3]  
[Anonymous], WORLD ENG CONV 2019
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, CREATIVITY DOMAINS F
[6]  
Anwar M.N., 2012, International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, V1, P1, DOI [10.1177/1529100611418056, DOI 10.1177/1529100611418056]
[7]   Creative production by angry people peaks early on, decreases over time, and is relatively unstructured [J].
Baas, Matthijs ;
De Dreu, Carsten K. W. ;
Nijstad, Bernard A. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 47 (06) :1107-1115
[8]   Gender differences in creativity [J].
Baer, John ;
Kaufman, James C. .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2008, 42 (02) :75-105
[9]   Bridging Generality and Specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) Model of Creativity [J].
Baer, John ;
Kaufman, James C. .
ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION, 2005, 27 (03) :158-163
[10]  
Bakhshi H., 2017, The Future of Skills: Employment in 2030