Shared Decision Making in mental health care using Routine Outcome Monitoring as a source of information: a cluster randomised controlled trial

被引:22
作者
Metz, Margot J. [1 ,2 ]
Franx, Gerdien C. [3 ,4 ]
Veerbeek, Marjolein A. [5 ]
de Beurs, Edwin [6 ,7 ]
van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M. [8 ,9 ]
Beekman, Aartjan T. F. [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Trimbos Inst, NL-5000 AT Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] GGz Breburg, NL-5000 AT Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Trimbos Inst, NL-1100 CE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Fdn 113Online, NL-1100 CE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Trimbos Inst, NL-3500 AS Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Leiden Univ, NL-3723 BK Bilthoven, Netherlands
[7] Stichting Benchmark GGZ, NL-3723 BK Bilthoven, Netherlands
[8] Tilburg Univ, NL-5000 AT Tilburg, Netherlands
[9] GGz Breburg, Clin Ctr Excellence Body Mind & Hlth, NL-5000 AT Tilburg, Netherlands
[10] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, NL-1081 HL Amsterdam, Netherlands
[11] GGZ InGeest, NL-1081 HL Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Routine Outcome Monitoring; Shared Decision Making; Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC); Cluster randomised controlled trial; Mental health care; WORKING ALLIANCE INVENTORY; PATIENTS INVOLVEMENT; FEEDBACK; QUALITY; SCHIZOPHRENIA; CLINICIAN; IMPACT; COLLABORATIVES; PSYCHOTHERAPY; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-015-0696-2
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Shared Decision Making (SDM) is a way to empower patients when decisions are made about treatment. In order to be effective agents in this process, patients need access to information of good quality. Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) may provide such information and therefore may be a key element in SDM. This trial tests the effectiveness of SDM using ROM, primarily aiming to diminish decisional conflict of the patient while making decisions about treatment. The degree of decisional conflict, the primary outcome of this study, encompasses personal certainty about choosing an appropriate treatment, information about options, clarification of patient values, support from others and patients experience of an effective decision making process. Secondary outcomes of the study focus on the working alliance between patient and clinician, adherence to treatment, and clinical outcome and quality of life. Methods/Design: This article presents the study protocol of a multi-centre two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT). The research is conducted in Dutch specialised mental health care teams participating in the ROM Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC), which aims to implement ROM in daily clinical practice. In the intervention teams, ROM is used as a source of information during the SDM process between the patient and clinician. Control teams receive no specific SDM or ROM instructions and apply decision making as usual. Randomisation is conducted at the level of the participating teams within the mental health organisations. A total of 12 teams from 4 organisations and 364 patients participate in the study. Prior to data collection, the intervention teams are trained to use ROM during the SDM process. Data collection will be at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months after inclusion of the patient. Control teams will implement the SDM and ROM model after completion of the study. Discussion: This study will provide useful information about the effectiveness of ROM within a SDM framework. Furthermore, with practical guidelines this study may contribute to the implementation of SDM using ROM in mental health care. Reporting of the results is expected from December 2016 onwards.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Shared decision-making preferences of people with severe mental illness [J].
Adams, Jared R. ;
Drake, Robert E. ;
Wolford, George L. .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2007, 58 (09) :1219-1221
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, DOI [DOI 10.1037/H0085885, 10.1037/h0085885]
[3]   Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research [J].
Ardito, Rita B. ;
Rebellino, Daniela .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 2
[4]   Patient preferences for medical decision making - Who really wants to participate? [J].
Arora, NK ;
McHorney, CA .
MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (03) :335-341
[5]  
Bunn MH, 1997, ARCH PSYCHIAT NURS, V11, P238
[6]   Interchangeability of the Working Alliance Inventory and Working Alliance Inventory, short form [J].
Busseri, MA ;
Tyler, JD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2003, 15 (02) :193-197
[7]   Routine outcome monitoring and feedback on physical or mental health status: evidence and theory [J].
Carlier, Ingrid V. E. ;
Meuldijk, Denise ;
Van Vliet, Irene M. ;
Van Fenema, Esther ;
Van der Wee, Nic J. A. ;
Zitman, Frans G. .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (01) :104-110
[8]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[9]   Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (05) :651-661
[10]   Primary care patients' involvement in decision-making is associated with improvement in depression [J].
Clever, SL ;
Ford, DE ;
Rubenstein, LV ;
Rost, KM ;
Meredith, LS ;
Sherbourne, CD ;
Wang, NY ;
Arbelaez, JJ ;
Cooper, LA .
MEDICAL CARE, 2006, 44 (05) :398-405