Landslide Susceptibility Mapping at National Scale: A First Attempt for Austria

被引:29
作者
Lima, Pedro [1 ]
Steger, Stefan [1 ]
Glade, Thomas [1 ]
Tilch, Nils [2 ]
Schwarz, Leonhard [2 ]
Kociu, Arben [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Geog & Reg Res, Univ Str 7, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[2] Geol Survey Austria, Dept Engn Geol, Neulinggasse 38, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
来源
ADVANCING CULTURE OF LIVING WITH LANDSLIDES, VOL 2: ADVANCES IN LANDSLIDE SCIENCE | 2017年
关键词
Landslide susceptibility; National scale; Logistic regression; Validation; Austria; GIS TECHNOLOGY; HAZARD; PREDICTION; MAPS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-53498-5_107
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Numerous publications that addressing landslide susceptibility were published over the past decades, also due to an increasing demand of spatial information regarding potentially endangered areas. However, studies that provide an overview on landslide susceptibility at national scale are still scarce. This research presents a first attempt to generate a national scale landslide susceptibility map for Austria based on statistical techniques. Binary logistic regression has been applied to delineate susceptible areas using three different predictor sets. The initial predictor set relates to topographic variables only (model A), and was gradually expanded with the factors geology (model B) and land cover (model C). The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) was used to validate the predictions by means of a k-fold cross-validation. The obtained acceptable prediction performances (mean AUROC of model A: 0.76, B: 0.81 and C: 0.82) suggest a relatively high predictive performance of all models. However, during this study, several limitations of the conducted analysis (e.g. limited landslide data, bias propagation, overoptimistic performance estimates) became evident. The main drawbacks and further steps towards a more reliable representation of landslide susceptibility at national scale are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:943 / 951
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Landslide Science and Practice, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-31325-7_38
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, J GEOL RES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Landslide Science and Practice
[4]   Generalised linear modelling of susceptibility to landsliding in the central Apennines, Italy [J].
Atkinson, PM ;
Massari, R .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 1998, 24 (04) :373-385
[5]   A country-wide spatial assessment of landslide susceptibility in Romania [J].
Balteanu, Dan ;
Chendes, Viorel ;
Sima, Mihaela ;
Enciu, Petru .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2010, 124 (3-4) :102-112
[6]  
Bell Glade T., 2013, Landslide Science and Practice, P467, DOI 10.
[7]  
Brabb E. E., 1984, IV International Symposium on Landslides [Canadian Geotechnical Society]., P307
[8]   Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation [J].
Brenning, A .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2005, 5 (06) :853-862
[9]   Landslide susceptibility near highways is increased by 1 order of magnitude in the Andes of southern Ecuador, Loja province [J].
Brenning, A. ;
Schwinn, M. ;
Ruiz-Paez, A. P. ;
Muenchow, J. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2015, 15 (01) :45-57
[10]   SPATIAL CROSS-VALIDATION AND BOOTSTRAP FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF PREDICTION RULES IN REMOTE SENSING: THE R PACKAGE SPERROREST [J].
Brenning, Alexander .
2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2012, :5372-5375