Not all Rowe scores are the same! Which Rowe score do you use?

被引：27

作者：

Jensen, Kai-Uwe ^{[1
]}

Bongaerts, Genio ^{[2
]}

Bruhn, Raphael ^{[2
]}

Schneider, Silke ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Arthro Clin Inst, D-22143 Hamburg, Germany

[2] Arthro Clin, Hamburg, Germany

来源：

JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY | 2009年 / 18卷 / 04期

关键词：

ARTHROSCOPIC BANKART REPAIR; SHOULDER; DISLOCATIONS; INSTABILITY;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.003

中图分类号：

R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background: The Rowe score is ail internationally recognized scoring system for the postoperative assessment of Bankart repairs; however, there are 4 different Rowe score versions. All 4 versions are used in parallel and results are sometimes published without any information about the Rowe score version used. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the correlation and agreement of the various Rowe score versions. Method: Sixty-two patients were scheduled for follow-up examination after arthroscopic Bankart repair. All 4 Rowe score versions were used. The results of all Rowe scores were compared and correlation and agreement evaluated. Result: The evaluation revealed significant differences. The highest mean score was observed in the 1988 Rowe score (empty set 88.7 points) and the lowest mean score in the 1981 Rowe score (empty set 73.6 points). Conclusion: Not all Rowe scores are the same! Therefore, the used Rowe score should always be indicated. It would be desirable to establish one sin-le Rowe score. Level of evidence: Level 3; Diagnostic study. (C) 2009 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees.

引用

页码：511 / 514

页数：4

共 10 条

[1] The instability severity index score [J].