Retroperitoneal Single Port Versus Transperitoneal Multiport Donor Nephrectomy: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial

被引:8
作者
Chauhan, Neelam [1 ]
Kenwar, Deepesh Benjamin [2 ]
Singh, Navdeep [2 ]
Singh, Sarbpreet [2 ]
Sharma, Ashish [2 ]
Kapoor, Kunal [2 ]
Kumar, Sandeep [2 ]
机构
[1] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Gen Surg, Chandigarh, India
[2] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Renal Transplant Surg, Chandigarh, India
关键词
laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy; visual analogue score; comfort score; retroperitoneal; lumbotomy; LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY; MORBIDITY; SCORES;
D O I
10.1089/end.2017.0829
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) converted a retroperitoneal (RP) procedure into a transperitoneal (TP) operation with reports of bowel and solid organ injuries leading to mortality in occasional cases. Laparoscopic RP donor nephrectomy can reduce these risks but never became popular because of the muscle cutting approach. Lumbotomy incision can be used to approach retroperitoneum by incising fascial planes, eliminating disadvantages of the RP approach. This report compares the outcomes of the standard multiport TP LDN with translumbar laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS-DN). Methods: Between January 2016 and June 2017, 50 voluntary kidney donors out of 267 donors were randomized to undergo LESS-DN vs LDN. Donors with body mass index 30kg/m(2), multiple renal arteries, and right-sided nephrectomy were excluded from the study. Postoperative pain, duration of surgery, length of graft vessels and ureter, warm ischemia time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, convalescence period, duration of hospital stay, and recipients' creatinine at discharge were compared among both the groups. Pain assessment was done using visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: The RP group experienced lesser pain (VAS score 0.30.3 vs 1.1 +/- 0.0, p=0.000), lesser analgesic requirement (186 +/- 51.07mg vs 254 +/- 62.7mg, p=0.000), and faster convalescence (7.0 +/- 3.0 days vs 10.7 +/- 3.3 days, p=0.00) related to smaller cumulative incision (7.8 +/- 0.8cm vs12.4 +/- 2.0cm, p=0.00), and had reduced operative time (142 +/- 26.2 minutes vs 170.8 +/- 34.75 minutes, p=0.001) and blood loss. Other recorded parameters were similar in both the groups. Conclusions: The single port RP approach significantly reduced postoperative pain and hastened recovery when compared with the TP approach. Converting to a RP approach presents an opportunity for surgeons to further reduce morbidity associated with the donor nephrectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 501
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Pfannenstiel Versus Standard Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy [J].
Andonian, Sero ;
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush ;
Atalla, Mohamed A. ;
Herati, Amin S. ;
Richstone, Lee ;
Kavoussi, Louis R. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (03) :429-432
[2]   Comparison of Flank, Dorsal Lumbotomy and Laparoscopic Approaches for Dismembered Pyeloplasty in Children Older Than 3 Years With Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction [J].
Braga, Luis H. P. ;
Lorenzo, Armando J. ;
Baegli, Darius J. ;
Mahdi, Mohamed ;
Salle, Joao L. Pippi ;
Khoury, Antoine E. ;
Farhat, Walid A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (01) :306-311
[3]  
Campbell M, 2016, CAMPBELL WALSH UROLO, P1455
[4]   Laparo-Endoscopic Single Site (LESS) versus Standard Laparoscopic Left Donor Nephrectomy: Matched-pair Comparison [J].
Canes, David ;
Berger, Andre ;
Aron, Monish ;
Brandina, Ricardo ;
Goldfarb, David A. ;
Shoskes, Daniel ;
Desai, Mihir M. ;
Gill, Inderbir S. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (01) :95-101
[5]   Pain vs comfort scores after Caesarean section: a randomized trial [J].
Chooi, C. S. L. ;
White, A. M. ;
Tan, S. G. M. ;
Dowling, K. ;
Cyna, A. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 110 (05) :780-787
[6]   Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy [J].
Desal, MM ;
Strzempkowski, B ;
Matin, SF ;
Steinberg, AP ;
Ng, C ;
Meraney, AM ;
Kaouk, JH ;
Gill, IS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (01) :38-41
[7]   Prospective Randomized Comparison of Transperitoneal vs Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Simple Nephrectomy [J].
Garg, Manish ;
Singh, Vishwajeet ;
Sinha, Rahul Janak ;
Sharma, Pradeep .
UROLOGY, 2014, 84 (02) :335-339
[8]   Surgical techniques in living donor nephrectomy [J].
Gibbons, Norma ;
Nicol, David .
NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 15 :S88-S95
[9]   Laparoscopic retroperitoneal live donor right nephrectomy for purposes of allotransplantation and autotransplantation [J].
Gill, IS ;
Uzzo, RG ;
Hobart, MG ;
Streem, SB ;
Goldfarb, DA ;
Noble, MJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (05) :1500-1504
[10]   Laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS-DN) versus standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy [J].
Gupta, Ameet ;
Ahmed, Kamran ;
Kynaston, Howard G. ;
Dasgupta, Prokar ;
Chlosta, Piotr L. ;
Aboumarzouk, Omar M. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (05)