SHOULD UNSTABLE QUANTUM FIELD THEORIES BE LORENTZ-INVARIANT?

An unstable field theory is what we obtain when we linearise the equations of an interacting field theory near an unstable state. Theories of this kind are adopted to model the onset of spontaneous symmetry breakings, when the fields are sitting on the top of the Mexican hat, and they start to "roll down" to the bottom. At present, there exists no rigorous proof that unstable quantum field theories are Lorentz-invariant (in the sense of Wigner's theorem). Here, we show that they should not be. In fact, unstable theories always have a limited regime of applicability, and they are valid only for a very short time. As a consequence, there is a preferred simultaneity hyperplane, along which the unstable theory is everywhere applicable, while a generic observer (whose four-velocity is not orthogonal to such hyperplane) must use the full non-linear theory. In summary: the current quantization schemes are "ok", independently of whether they lead to a Lorentz-invariant theory.