Knowledge & attitudes of mental health professionals regarding psychiatric research

被引:0
作者
Mishra, N. N. [1 ]
Bhatia, Triptish [1 ]
Kumar, Nandini [2 ]
Nimgaonkar, Vishwajit L. [3 ,4 ]
Parker, Lisa S. [5 ]
Deshpande, Smita N. [1 ]
机构
[1] PGIMER Dr RML Hosp, Dept Psychiat, New Delhi 110001, India
[2] Natl Inst Epidemiol ICMR, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, UPMC, Dept Psychiat, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, UPMC, Dept Human Genet, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Bioeth & Hlth Law, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
Confidentiality; ethical guidelines; informed consent; mental health professionals; mental health research; INFORMED-CONSENT; SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH; INFORMATION; ETHICS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background & objectives: Mental health professionals have varied attitudes and views regarding informed consent and confidentiality protections in psychiatric research and clinical care. The present study was designed to understand the knowledge and views of mental health professionals (MHPs) regarding informed consent and confidentiality protection practices. Methods: Mental health professionals (n=121) who were members of the Delhi Psychiatric Society, were invited to participate in this questionnaire-based study of their knowledge and attitudes regarding informed consent and confidentiality. Half of them expressed willingness to discuss participation and gave initial oral consent (n=62); of these, 31 gave written informed consent to participate and completed the questionnaires. The questionnaires included both forced choice (yes / no / do not know) and open-ended questions. Questionnaires content reflected prominent guidelines on informed consent and confidentiality protection. Results: Attitudes of the majority of the participants towards informed consent and confidentiality were in line with ethical principles and guidelines. All expressed the opinion that confidentiality should generally be respected and that if confidentiality was breached, there could be mistrust of the professional by the patient/participant. The mean knowledge scores regarding informed consent and confidentiality were 8.55 +/- 1.46 and 8.16 +/- 1.29, respectively. Interpretation & conclusions: The participating mental health professionals appeared to have adequate knowledge of basic ethical guidelines concerning informed consent and confidentiality. Most respondents were aware of ethical issues in research. Given the small sample size and low response rate, the significance of the quantitative analysis must be regarded with modesty, and qualitative analysis of open-ended questions may be more valuable for development of future research. Increased efforts to involve mental health professionals in research on ethical concerns pertinent to their work must be made, and the actual practices of these professionals with regard to ethical guidelines need to be studied.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 251
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Ethics in psychiatric research and practice [J].
Adshead, G .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 9 (05) :348-351
[2]   The need for additional safeguards in the informed consent process in schizophrenia research [J].
Anderson, Kelly K. ;
Mukherjee, Som D. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2007, 33 (11) :647-650
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ETH GUID BIOM RES HU
[4]   A study of the opinions and behaviors of physicians with regard to informed consent and refusing treatment [J].
Ataç, A ;
Guven, T ;
Uçar, M ;
Fir, T .
MILITARY MEDICINE, 2005, 170 (07) :566-571
[5]  
Berg JW., 2001, INFORM CONSENT LEGAL, VSecond, DOI 10.1093/oso/9780195126778.003.0023
[6]   Medical and legal professionals' attitudes towards confidentiality and disclosure of clinical information in forensic settings: a survey using case vignettes [J].
Bruggen, Marie-Charlotte ;
Eytan, Ariel ;
Gravier, Bruno ;
Elger, Bernice S. .
MEDICINE SCIENCE AND THE LAW, 2013, 53 (03) :132-148
[7]  
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), 1993, INT GUID BIOM RES IN
[8]   Research on the mentally incompetent [J].
Cuénod, M ;
Gasser, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2003, 29 (01) :19-21
[9]   Informed consent in psychiatric research [J].
Davies, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 178 :397-398
[10]   Emerging findings in ethics of schizophrenia research [J].
Dunn, LB ;
Roberts, LW .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 18 (02) :111-119