Appropriateness of psychostimulant prescription to children: Theoretical and empirical perspectives

Objectives: 1) To consider study designs for evaluating how appropriately stimulant medications are prescribed to children. 2) To investigate appropriateness by seeking evidence of consensus around how stimulant management should be undertaken, collecting and reviewing evidence of actual physician practice in relation to rise of stimulants, and evaluating the closeness of fit between recommended and actual practice. Method: Electronic databases and other published and unpublished material were searched for the decade 1987-1997 to identify 1) authoritative recommendations for medical management of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and 2) surveys of physician practice. Available information was analyzed qualitatively for commonalities and trends and for concordance between recommendations and practice. Results: Despite differences in emphasis between experts, common themes were identifiable regarding prerequisites and follow-up for use of stimulants. Overall, it was rare to find physician practice in accordance with expert recommendations more than 70% of the time, suggesting that management may be suboptimal in at least 30% of children treated with medication for ADHD. Across surveys, consistent differences appear in physician practice patterns related to practice type. Management by specialist consultants approximates standards recommended by experts, while management by primary care practitioners diverges from these standards. Conclusions: There are grounds for concern about the quality and appropriateness of medical management for children with ADHD. The methodology used in this study holds promise for wider application, with planning and refinement. There is a need to find ways to improve care for children with ADHD provided by primary care physicians.