Air vs contrast pyelogram for initial puncture access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized controlled trial

被引:2
作者
Gupta, Prateek [1 ]
Choudhary, Gautam Ram [1 ]
Pandey, Himanshu [1 ]
Madduri, Vijay Kumar Sarma [1 ]
Singh, Mahendra [1 ]
Pallagani, Likhiteswer [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Urol, Jodhpur, India
关键词
Air pyelogram; Contrast pyelogram; Pcnl; Urolithiasis; Initial puncture; Percutaneous; Nephrolithotomy; RETROGRADE PYELOGRAM; FLUOROSCOPIC ACCESS; RESIDUAL FRAGMENTS; RENAL ACCESS; EMBOLISM; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00240-020-01222-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a standard procedure for large renal stones. Contrast (traditionally) as well as air is being used to delineate pelvi-calyceal system (PCS) to perform initial puncture. Contrast, when used has certain disadvantages including poor differentiation of anterior and posterior calyces. In this interim analysis of 122 patients of a prospective study subjects were stratified in two groups: in group 1, contrast was used while in group 2, air was used to delineate PCS. Out of 122,103 patients underwent puncture by contrast or air exclusively while 19 patients required mix of contrast and air (14 patients failed puncture using contrast while 5 using air). Mean dosage of radiation exposure (8.43 vs. 14.26 mGy), duration of radiation exposure (0.66 vs. 1.02 min), access time (3.72 vs. 5.84 min), were less in group 2 as compared to group 1. 84.5% of patients underwent puncture in single attempt in group 2 as compared to 56.25% in group 1. Five patients had post-operative fever and one had trans-pleural tract dilation. Complete stone clearance was seen in 94.8% of patients using air to only 75% of patients using contrast. Conclusion: Air pyelogram is a feasible, safe, cost effective and efficient access alternative to contrast pyelogram and in difficult situation a mixture of both is better than using one.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 267
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Safety and efficacy of ultrasonography as an adjunct to fluoroscopy for renal access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) [J].
Agarwal, Mayank ;
Agrawal, Madhu S. ;
Jaiswal, Abhinav ;
Kumar, Deepak ;
Yadav, Himanshu ;
Lavania, Prashant .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (08) :1346-1349
[2]  
Assimos D, 2016, J UROLOGY, V196, P1161, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091
[3]   Ultrasonographic versus fluoroscopic access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomized clinical trial [J].
Bastri, Abbas ;
Ziaee, Amir M. ;
Kianian, Hamid R. ;
Mehrabi, Sadrallah ;
Karami, Hormoz ;
Moghaddam, Seyed M. Hosseini .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (02) :281-284
[4]   Paradoxical air embolism during percutaneous nephrolithotomy due to patent foramen ovale: Case report [J].
Chahal, Daljeet ;
Ruzhynsky, Vladimir ;
McAuley, Iain ;
Sweeney, Desmond ;
Sobkin, Paul ;
Kinahan, Michael ;
Gardiner, Rich ;
Kinahan, John .
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (9-10) :E658-E660
[5]   Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) a critical review [J].
Ganpule, Arvind P. ;
Vijayakumar, Mohankumar ;
Malpani, Ankur ;
Desai, Mahesh R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 36 :660-664
[6]   Air embolism during percutaneous nephrolithotomy using air pyelogram during initial access: Does it really occur? [J].
Garg, Anshul ;
Khan, Mohd Mubashir Ali ;
Singh, Praveen ;
Agarwal, Manish Kumar .
UROLOGY ANNALS, 2020, 12 (01) :54-56
[7]   PCNL in the prone position VS PCNL in the modified supine Double-S position: is there a better position? A prospective randomized trial [J].
Giusti, Giuseppe ;
De Lisa, Antonello .
UROLITHIASIS, 2020, 48 (01) :63-69
[8]  
Hefny Ashraf F, 2011, J Emerg Trauma Shock, V4, P511, DOI 10.4103/0974-2700.86649
[9]  
Kathpalia R, 2012, INDIAN J UROL, V28, P237
[10]   Percutaneous nephrolithotomy made easier: a practical guide, tips and tricks [J].
Ko, Raymond ;
Soucy, Frederic ;
Denstedt, John D. ;
Razvi, Hassan .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (05) :535-539