Uncloaking a lost cause: Decolonizing ancestry estimation in the United States

被引:41
作者
DiGangi, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Bethard, Jonathan D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Binghamton Univ, Dept Anthropol, Binghamton, NY USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Dept Anthropol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
ancestry estimation; craniometrics; critical race theory; dental morphology; forensic anthropology; morphoscopic traits; race science; IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY; FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGISTS; RACIAL DISPARITIES; RACE; DIVERSITY; POLICE; SCIENCE; EXPERIENCES; EMBODIMENT;
D O I
10.1002/ajpa.24212
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Since the professionalization of US-based forensic anthropology in the 1970s, ancestry estimation has been included as a standard part of the biological profile, because practitioners have assumed it necessary to achieve identifications in medicolegal contexts. Simultaneously, forensic anthropologists have not fully considered the racist context of the criminal justice system in the United States related to the treatment of Black, Indigenous, and People of Color; nor have we considered that ancestry estimation might actually hinder identification efforts because of entrenched racial biases. Despite ongoing criticisms from mainstream biological anthropology that ancestry estimation perpetuates race science, forensic anthropologists have continued the practice. Recent years have seen the prolific development of retooled typological approaches with 21st century statistical prowess to include methods for estimating ancestry from cranial morphoscopic traits, despite no evidence that these traits reflect microevolutionary processes or are suitable genetic proxies for population structure; and such approaches have failed to critically evaluate the societal consequences for perpetuating the biological race concept. Around the country, these methods are enculturated in every aspect of the discipline ranging from university classrooms, to the board-certification examination marking the culmination of training, to standard operating procedures adopted by forensic anthropology laboratories. Here, we use critical race theory to interrogate the approaches utilized to estimate ancestry to include a critique of the continued use of morphoscopic traits, and we assert that the practice of ancestry estimation contributes to white supremacy. Based on the lack of scientific support that these traits reflect evolutionary history, and the inability to disentangle skeletal-based ancestry estimates from supporting the biological validity of race, we urge all forensic anthropologists to abolish the practice of ancestry estimation.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 436
页数:15
相关论文
共 163 条
  • [21] Letter to the Editor-Moving Beyond a Lost Cause: Forensic Anthropology and Ancestry Estimates in the United States
    Bethard, Jonathan D.
    DiGangi, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2020, 65 (05) : 1791 - 1792
  • [22] Historical Trends in Graduate Research and Training of Diplomates of the American Board of Forensic Anthropology
    Bethard, Jonathan D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2017, 62 (01) : 5 - 11
  • [23] Bird C.E., 2018, SOCIOPOLITICS MIGRAN, P157, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-61866-1_12, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-61866-1_12]
  • [24] Identifying southwest Hispanics using nonmetric traits and the cultural profile
    Birkby, Walter H.
    Fenton, Todd W.
    Anderson, Bruce E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2008, 53 (01) : 29 - 33
  • [25] Blakey M.L., 2020, WEBINAR RECLAIMING A
  • [26] Blakey M.L., 1996, RACE OTHER MISADVENT, P65
  • [27] Archaeology under the Blinding Light of Race
    Blakey, Michael L.
    [J]. CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY, 2020, 61 : S183 - S197
  • [28] Blakey MichaelL., 1987, Critique of Anthropology, V7, P7, DOI DOI 10.1177/0308275X8700700203
  • [29] Blakey ML, 1999, LIT PSYCHOL, V45, P29
  • [30] Blakey ML., 1994, RACE, P270, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTT7SNKJ