Surveillance of low pathogenic novel H7N9 avian influenza in commercial poultry barns: detection of outbreaks and estimation of virus introduction time

被引:6
|
作者
Pinsent, Amy [1 ]
Blake, Isobel M. [1 ]
White, Michael T. [1 ]
Riley, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, MRC Ctr Outbreak Anal & Modelling, Dept Infect Dis Epidemiol, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
H7N9; Influenza; Surveillance; R-0; Poultry; A H7N9; HUMAN INFECTIONS; H5N1; SUSCEPTIBILITY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; TRANSMISSION; ANTIBODIES; GENOTYPES; CHICKENS;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2334-14-427
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Both high and low pathogenic subtype A avian influenza remain ongoing threats to the commercial poultry industry globally. The emergence of a novel low pathogenic H7N9 lineage in China presents itself as a new concern to both human and animal health and may necessitate additional surveillance in commercial poultry operations in affected regions. Methods: Sampling data was simulated using a mechanistic model of H7N9 influenza transmission within commercial poultry barns together with a stochastic observation process. Parameters were estimated using maximum likelihood. We assessed the probability of detecting an outbreak at time of slaughter using both real-time polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR) and a hemagglutinin inhibition assay (HI assay) before considering more intense sampling prior to slaughter. The day of virus introduction and R-0 were estimated jointly from weekly flock sampling data. For scenarios where R-0 was known, we estimated the day of virus introduction into a barn under different sampling frequencies. Results: If birds were tested at time of slaughter, there was a higher probability of detecting evidence of an outbreak using an HI assay compared to rt-PCR, except when the virus was introduced < 2 weeks before time of slaughter. Prior to the initial detection of infection N-sample = 50 (1%) of birds were sampled on a weekly basis once, but after infection was detected, N-sample = 2000 birds (40%) were sampled to estimate both parameters. We accurately estimated the day of virus introduction in isolation with weekly and 2-weekly sampling. Conclusions: A strong sampling effort would be required to infer both the day of virus introduction and R-0. Such a sampling effort would not be required to estimate the day of virus introduction alone once R-0 was known, and sampling N-sample = 50 of birds in the flock on a weekly or 2 weekly basis would be sufficient.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Detection and Molecular Characterization of the Avian Influenza A (H7N9) Virus in Eastern China in 2013
    Yang, Zhu
    Pei, Zenglin
    Jiang, Kejia
    Yu, Wenqing
    Wang, Yu
    JUNDISHAPUR JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 9 (12) : 1 - 8
  • [42] Environmental connections of novel avian-origin H7N9 influenza virus infection and virus adaptation to the human
    Li Jun
    Yu XinFen
    Pu XiaoYing
    Xie Li
    Sun YongXiang
    Xiao HaiXia
    Wang FenJuan
    Din Hua
    Wu Ying
    Liu Di
    Zhao GuoQiu
    Liu Jun
    Pan JingCao
    SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES, 2013, 56 (06) : 485 - 492
  • [43] Avian Influenza A (H7N9) Model Based on Poultry Transport Network in China
    Zhang, Juping
    Jing, Wenjun
    Zhang, Wenyi
    Jin, Zhen
    COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE, 2018, 2018
  • [44] An avian influenza virus A(H7N9) reassortant that recently emerged in the United States with low pathogenic phenotype does not efficiently infect swine
    Powell, Joshua D.
    Abente, Eugenio J.
    Torchetti, Mia K.
    Killian, Mary L.
    Vincent, Amy L.
    INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2019, 13 (03) : 288 - 291
  • [45] The Origin of Internal Genes Contributes to the Replication and Transmission Fitness of H7N9 Avian Influenza Virus
    James, Joe
    Bhat, Sushant
    Walsh, Sarah K.
    Karunarathna, Thusitha K.
    Sadeyen, Jean-Remy
    Chang, Pengxiang
    Sealy, Joshua E.
    Mahmood, Sahar
    Mollett, Benjamin C.
    Slomka, Marek J.
    Brookes, Sharon M.
    Iqbal, Munir
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 2022, 96 (22)
  • [46] Emergency surveillance for novel influenza A(H7N9) virus in domestic poultry, feral pigeons and other wild birds in Bhutan
    Tenzin, T.
    Tenzin, S.
    Tshering, D.
    Lhamo, K.
    Rai, P. B.
    Dahal, N.
    Dukpa, K.
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2015, 34 (03): : 829 - 836
  • [47] Different intervention strategies toward live poultry markets against avian influenza A (H7N9) virus: Model-based assessment
    Zhu, Guanghu
    Kang, Min
    Wei, Xueli
    Tang, Tian
    Liu, Tao
    Xiao, Jianpeng
    Song, Tie
    Ma, Wenjun
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 198
  • [48] Effectiveness of Live Poultry Market Interventions on Human Infection with Avian Influenza A(H7N9) Virus, China
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Xi-Ling
    Kucharski, Adam J.
    Pei, Yao
    Tong, Xin
    Virlogeux, Victor
    Wu, Peng
    Cowling, Benjamin J.
    Gilbert, Marius
    Yu, Hongjie
    Artois, Jean
    EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 26 (05) : 891 - 901
  • [49] Spatiotemporal Variation and Hotspot Detection of the Avian Influenza A(H7N9) Virus in China, 2013-2017
    Li, Zeng
    Fu, Jingying
    Lin, Gang
    Jiang, Dong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (04)
  • [50] Novel human H7N9 influenza virus in China
    Wang, Chengmin
    Luo, Jing
    Wang, Jing
    Su, Wen
    Gao, Shanshan
    Zhang, Min
    Xie, Li
    Ding, Hua
    Liu, Shelan
    Liu, Xiaodong
    Chen, Yu
    Jia, Yaxiong
    He, Hongxuan
    INTEGRATIVE ZOOLOGY, 2014, 9 (03): : 372 - 375