Globalization and global risk: How risk analysis needs to be enhanced to be effective in confronting current threats

被引:41
作者
Aven, Terje [1 ]
Zio, Enrico [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
[2] PSL Univ, MINES ParisTech, Paris, France
[3] Politecn Milan, Milan, Italy
关键词
Global risk; Coronavirus; Risk science; Resilience; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2020.107270
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the last 20-30 years, technological innovation has enabled the advancement of industry at a global scale, giving rise to a truly global society, resting on an interdependent web of transnational technical, economic and social systems. These systems are exposed to scenarios of cascading outbreaks, whose impacts can ripple to very large scales through their strong interdependencies, as recently shown by the pandemic spreading of the Coronavirus. Considerable work has been conducted in recent years to develop frameworks to support the assessment, communication, management and governance of this type of risk, building on concepts like systemic risks, complexity theory, deep uncertainties, resilience engineering, adaptive management and black swans. Yet contemporary risk analysis struggles to provide authoritative societal guidance for adequately handling these types of risks, as clearly illustrated by the Coronavirus case. In this paper, we reflect on this situation. We aim to identify critical challenges in current frameworks of risk assessment and management and point to ways to strengthen these, to be better able to confront threats like the Coronavirus in the future. A set of principles and theses are established, which have the potential to support a common foundation for the many different scientific perspectives and 'schools' currently dealing with risk handling issues.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 56 条
[11]   Some foundational issues related to risk governance and different types of risks [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Renn, Ortwin .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2020, 23 (09) :1121-1134
[12]   A risk interpretation of sociotechnical safety perspectives [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Ylonen, Marja .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2018, 175 :13-18
[13]   An Emerging New Risk Analysis Science: Foundations and Implications [J].
Aven, Terje .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2018, 38 (05) :876-888
[14]  
Aven T, 2010, RISK GOV SOC, V16, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-13926-0
[15]   Conceptualistic Pragmatism: A framework for Bayesian analysis? [J].
Bergman, Bo .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2009, 41 (01) :86-93
[16]  
Deming W.E., 2000, NEW EC, V2nd
[17]   Complexity, uncertainty and surprise: An integrated view [J].
Driebe, DJ ;
McDaniel, RR .
Uncertainty and Surprise in Complex Systems: Questions on Working with the Unexpected, 2005, :19-30
[18]  
DUFFEY RB, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P1078
[19]   Prediction of CoVid-19 infection, transmission and recovery rates: A new analysis and global societal comparisons [J].
Duffey, Romney B. ;
Zio, Enrico .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2020, 129
[20]  
Funtowicz S.O., 1990, UNCERTAINTY QUALITY