Early and Late Reoperation Rates With Various MIS Techniques for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction

被引:14
|
作者
Eastlack, Robert K. [1 ]
Srinivas, Ravi [1 ]
Mundis, Gregory M., Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Nguyen, Stacie [2 ]
Mummaneni, Praveen, V [3 ]
Okonkwo, David O. [4 ]
Kanter, Adam S. [4 ]
Anand, Neel [5 ]
Park, Paul [6 ]
Nunley, Pierce [7 ]
Uribe, Juan S. [8 ]
Akbarnia, Behrooz A. [2 ]
Chou, Dean [3 ]
Deviren, Vedat [3 ]
机构
[1] Scripps Clin, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[2] San Diego Spine Fdn, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Cedars Sinai, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Louisiana Spine Inst, Shreveport, LA USA
[8] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL USA
[9] Int Spine Study Grp, Res, Brighton, CO USA
关键词
reoperation; minimally invasive surgery; adult spinal deformity; PEDICLE SUBTRACTION OSTEOTOMY; PROXIMAL JUNCTIONAL KYPHOSIS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; PRIMARY FUSION; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; REVISION; IMPACT; SACRUM;
D O I
10.1177/2192568218761032
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: A multicenter retrospective review of an adult spinal deformity database. Objective: We aimed to characterize reoperation rates and etiologies of adult spinal deformity surgery with circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS) and hybrid (HYB) techniques. Methods: Inclusion criteria were age >= 18 years, and one of the following: coronal Cobb >20 degrees, sagittal vertical axis >5 cm, pelvic tilt >20 degrees, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis >10 degrees. Patients with either cMIS or HYB surgery, >= 3 spinal levels treated with 2-year minimum follow-up were included. Results: A total of 133 patients met inclusion for this study (65 HYB and 68 cMIS). Junctional failure (13.8%) was the most common reason for reoperation in the HYB group, while fixation failure was the most common reason in the cMIS group (14.7%). There was a higher incidence of proximal junctional failure (PJF) than distal junctional failure (DJF) within HYB (12.3% vs 3.1%), but no significant differences in PJF or DJF rates when compared to cMIS. Early (<30 days) reoperations were less common (cMIS = 1.5%; HYB = 6.1%) than late (>30 days) reoperations (cMIS = 26.5%; HYB = 27.7%), but early reoperations were more common in the HYB group after propensity matching, largely due to infection rates (10.8% vs 0%, P = .04). Conclusions: Adult spinal deformity correction with cMIS and HYB techniques result in overall reoperation rates of 27.9% and 33.8%, respectively, at minimum 2-year follow-up. Junctional failures are more common after HYB approaches, while pseudarthrosis/fixation failures happen more often with cMIS techniques. Early reoperations were less common than later returns to the operating room in both groups, but cMIS demonstrated less risk of infection and early reoperation when compared with the HYB group.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 47
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A guide to selecting upper thoracic versus lower thoracic uppermost instrumented vertebra in adult spinal deformity correction
    Kumar, Rohit Prem
    Adida, Samuel
    Lavadi, Raj Swaroop
    Mitha, Rida
    Legarreta, Andrew D.
    Hudson, Joseph S.
    Shah, Manan
    Diebo, Bassel
    Fields, Daryl P.
    Buell, Thomas J.
    Hamilton, D. Kojo
    Daniels, Alan H.
    Agarwal, Nitin
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (07) : 2742 - 2750
  • [22] Reoperation rates in minimally invasive, hybrid and open surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity with minimum 2-year follow-up
    Hamilton, D. Kojo
    Kanter, Adam S.
    Bolinger, Bryan D.
    Mundis, Gregory M., Jr.
    Nguyen, Stacie
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Anand, Neel
    Fessler, Richard G.
    Passias, Peter G.
    Park, Paul
    La Marca, Frank
    Uribe, Juan S.
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Akbarnia, Behrooz A.
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Okonkwo, David O.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (08) : 2605 - 2611
  • [23] Risk factors for unplanned reoperation after corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity
    Ryu, S-j.
    So, J-y.
    Ha, Y.
    Kuh, S-u.
    Chin, D-k.
    Kim, K-s.
    Cho, Y-e.
    Kim, K-h.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (04): : 245 - 255
  • [24] Proximal Lumbar Anterior Column Realignment for Iatrogenic Sagittal Plane Adult Spinal Deformity Correction: A Retrospective Case Series
    Frerich, Jason M.
    Dibble, Christopher F.
    Park, Christine
    Bergin, Stephen M.
    Goodwin, C. Rory
    Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M.
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Than, Khoi D.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 193 : 884 - 892
  • [25] Predicting Clinical Outcomes Following Surgical Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity
    Sharma, Akshay
    Tanenbaum, Joseph E.
    Hogue, Olivia
    Mehdi, Syed
    Vallabh, Sagar
    Hu, Emily
    Benzel, Edward C.
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    Savage, Jason W.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 84 (03) : 733 - 740
  • [26] Persistent Lower Extremity Compensation for Sagittal Imbalance After Surgical Correction of Complex Adult Spinal Deformity: A Radiographic Analysis of Early Impact
    Williamson, Tyler K.
    Dave, Pooja
    Mir, Jamshaid M.
    Smith, Justin S.
    Lafage, Renaud
    Line, Breton
    Diebo, Bassel G.
    Daniels, Alan H.
    Gum, Jeffrey L.
    Protopsaltis, Themistocles S.
    Hamilton, D. Kojo
    Soroceanu, Alex
    Scheer, Justin K.
    Eastlack, Robert
    Kelly, Michael P.
    Nunley, Pierce
    Kebaish, Khaled M.
    Lewis, Stephen
    Lenke, Lawrence G.
    Hostin Jr, Richard A.
    Gupta, Munish C.
    Kim, Han Jo
    Ames, Christopher P.
    Hart, Robert A.
    Burton, Douglas C.
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Klineberg, Eric O.
    Schwab, Frank J.
    Lafage, Virginie
    Chou, Dean
    Fu, Kai-Ming
    Bess, Shay
    Passias, Peter G.
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 26 (02) : 156 - 164
  • [27] The Effects of Global Alignment and Proportionality Scores on Postoperative Outcomes After Adult Spinal Deformity Correction
    Passias, Peter G.
    Krol, Oscar
    Owusu-Sarpong, Stephane
    Tretiakov, Peter
    Passfall, Lara
    Kummer, Nicholas
    Ani, Fares
    Imbo, Bailey
    Joujon-Roche, Rachel
    Williamson, Tyler K.
    Sagoo, Navraj S.
    Vira, Shaleen
    Schoenfeld, Andrew
    de la Garza Ramos, Rafael
    Janjua, Muhammad Burhan
    Sciubba, Daniel
    Diebo, Bassel G.
    Paulino, Carl
    Smith, Justin
    Lafage, Renaud
    Lafage, Virginie
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 24 (05) : 533 - 541
  • [28] Thirty-Day Reoperation and Readmission Rates after Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity via Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgery - Analysis of a 7-Year Experience
    Anand N.
    Sardar Z.M.
    Simmonds A.
    Khandehroo B.
    Kahwaty S.
    Baron E.M.
    Spine Deformity, 2016, 4 (1) : 78 - 83
  • [29] Adult Deformity Correction Through Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach Techniques
    Mundis, Gregory M.
    Akbarnia, Behrooz A.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : S312 - S321
  • [30] Pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adult spinal deformity correction: Clinical and radiographic risk factors for early instrumentation failure
    Penalosa, Bryan S.
    Ramos, Omar
    Patel, Shalin S.
    Cheng, Wayne K.
    Danisa, Olumide A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 94 : 266 - 270