The potential of sweet sorghum as a source of ethanol and protein

被引:40
作者
Cifuentes, Rolando [1 ]
Bressani, Ricardo [2 ]
Rolz, Carlos [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valle Guatemala, Res Inst, Ctr Agr & Forestry Studies, Guatamala, Guatemala
[2] Univ Valle Guatemala, Res Inst, Food Sci & Technol Ctr, Guatamala, Guatemala
[3] Univ Valle Guatemala, Res Inst, Ctr Biochem Engn, Guatamala, Guatemala
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
Sweet sorghum; Stem yield; Sugar productivity; Grain protein digestibility; Ethanol productivity; BICOLOR-L; MOENCH; BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION; PLANTING DATE; CV KELLER; SUGAR; FERMENTATION; BIOMASS; YIELD; QUALITY; JUICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.esd.2014.04.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sweet sorghum is a multipurpose crop with the potential to achieve sustainable biofuel production, human food and animal feed products. Six sweet sorghum varieties were sowed in the Guatemalan Pacific coastal plains for this study. Our goal was to determine which sweet sorghum variety had the combination of higher ethanol productivity from the stem's soluble sugar, and higher nutritional value from the grain. The Top 76-6 variety had the best combined outcome of, higher ethanol productivity and best grain protein quality. The stem and grain average yields obtained were 42.15 Mg of fresh stalk/ha and 236 Mg dry grain/ha, respectively. The average ethanol productivity was approximately 220 g ethanol per kg of original dry stem, equivalent to 2465 1 of ethanol per ha. The grain had the lowest polyphenol levels and an adequate relative protein quality indicated by a 1.07 protein efficiency ratio value and an 83.2% protein digestibility. (C) 2014 International Energy Initiative. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 19
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Albuquerque C. J. B., 2012, Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo, V11, P79
[2]   Non-structural carbohydrates and fibre components in sweet and fibre sorghum as affected by low and normal input techniques [J].
Amaducci, S ;
Monti, A ;
Venturi, G .
INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2004, 20 (01) :111-118
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Official Methods of Analysis, V16th
[4]   Evaluation of the functional quality of cowpea-fortified traditional African sorghum foods using instrumental and descriptive sensory analysis [J].
Anyango, Joseph O. ;
de Kock, Henriette L. ;
Taylor, John R. N. .
LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 44 (10) :2126-2133
[5]   Sweet Sorghum as Feedstock for Ethanol Production: Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Steam-Pretreated Bagasse [J].
Balint Sipos ;
Reczey, Jutka ;
Somorai, Zsolt ;
Kadar, Zsofia ;
Dienes, Dora ;
Reczey, Kati .
APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 153 (1-2) :151-162
[6]   Discrepancy in glucose and fructose utilisation during fermentation by Saccharmyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains [J].
Berthels, NJ ;
Otero, RRC ;
Bauer, FF ;
Thevelein, JM ;
Pretorius, IS .
FEMS YEAST RESEARCH, 2004, 4 (07) :683-689
[7]  
Blümmel M, 2009, ANIM NUTR FEED TECHN, V9, P1
[8]  
Bruins ME, 2012, BIOFUEL BIOPROD BIOR, V6, P135, DOI [10.1002/bbb.1319, 10.1002/bbb1319]
[9]   An assessment of sweet sorghum cultivars for ethanol production [J].
Chavan U.D. ;
Patil J.V. ;
Shinde M.S. .
Sugar Tech, 2009, 11 (4) :319-323
[10]   Fuel ethanol production from sweet sorghum using repeated-batch fermentation [J].
Chohnan, Shigeru ;
Nakane, Megumi ;
Rahman, M. Habibur ;
Nitta, Youji ;
Yoshiura, Takanori ;
Ohta, Hiroyuki ;
Kurusu, Yasurou .
JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING, 2011, 111 (04) :433-436