An assessment of the impacts of the REDD plus pilot project on community forests user groups (CFUGs) and their community forests in Nepal

被引:106
作者
Maraseni, T. N. [1 ]
Neupane, P. R. [2 ]
Lopez-Casero, E. [3 ]
Cadman, T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Queensland, Australian Ctr Sustainable Catchments, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[2] Nepal FON, Kathmandu, Nepal
[3] IGES, Hayama, Japan
[4] Griffith Univ, Inst Eth Governance & Law, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia
关键词
REDD; Pilot project; Social safeguard; REDD plus payment; Nepal;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
REDD+ has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, meet climate stabilisation targets and protect biological diversity. Consequently, millions of dollars are being channelled into developing countries rich in forests, for pilot projects that will provide data for the design of REDD+ projects that are based on incentives and performance. This paper evaluates the impacts of REDD+ pilot projects on community forests and associated user groups (CFUGs) in Nepal. A field study targeted eight CFUGs that participated in a REDD+ pilot project funded by the Forest Carbon Trust Fund in Nepal. The pilot project increased the participation of Dalit, Indigenous people, women and the poor, and was able to provide some social safeguards. However, when all the additional costs and foregone benefits of the project are considered, REDD+ is not an attractive market-based option for Nepalese CFUGs. A better approach would be a bilateral or multilateral approach that is not market based, but provides incentives beyond environmental and social safeguards. The results of this study will be useful in designing REDD+ policies and programmes for community forest-based REDD+ stakeholders in developing countries. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 46
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[31]   Does Adaptive Collaborative Forest Governance Affect Poverty? Participatory Action Research in Nepal's Community Forests [J].
McDougall, Cynthia ;
Jiggins, Janice ;
Pandit, Bishnu Hari ;
Rana, Sushila K. Thapa Magar ;
Leeuwis, Cees .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 26 (11) :1235-1251
[32]   Investments in different taxonomies of goods: What should Nepal's community forest user groups prioritize? [J].
Baral, Sony ;
Chhetri, Bir Bahadur Khanal ;
Baral, Himlal ;
Vacik, Harald .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 100 :24-32
[33]   Cooperative behavior and common pool resources: Experimental evidence from community forest user groups in Nepal [J].
Bluffstone, Randy ;
Dannenberg, Astrid ;
Martinsson, Peter ;
Jha, Prakash ;
Bista, Rajesh .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 129
[34]   Does Nepal's community forestry program improve the rural household economy? A cost-benefit analysis of community forestry user groups in Kaski and Syangja districts of Nepal [J].
Parajuli, Rajan ;
Lamichhane, Dhananjaya ;
Joshi, Omkar .
JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2015, 20 (06) :475-483
[35]   First camera-trap evidence of the Critically Endangered Chinese pangolin Manis pentadactyla in Kavrepalanchok community forests, Nepal [J].
Shrestha, Nischal ;
Pandey, Sadip Raj ;
Shrestha, Sandeep ;
Bashyal, Ashish .
ORYX, 2025, 59 (01) :61-64
[36]   Aboveground carbon of community-managed Chirpine (Pinus roxburghii Sarg.) forests of Nepal based on stand types and geographic aspects [J].
Pariyar, Shiva ;
Volkova, Liubov ;
Sharma, Ram P. ;
Sunam, Ramesh ;
Weston, Christopher J. .
PEERJ, 2019, 7
[37]   Pro-poor Commercial Management of Non-timber Forest Products in Nepal's Community Forest User Groups: Factors for Success [J].
Gauli, Kalyan ;
Hauser, Michael .
MOUNTAIN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 29 (04) :298-307