The effect of mode of presentation on Tower of Hanoi problem solving

被引:4
作者
Fansher, Madison [1 ]
Shah, Priti [1 ]
Helie, Sebastien [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Problem solving; Strategy learning; Internal representations; External representations; WORKING-MEMORY; AGE-DIFFERENCES; REPRESENTATIONS; PERFORMANCE; MECHANISMS; THINKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105041
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Tower of Hanoi (TOH) is a classic problem that can be solved via multiple strategies. This study used TOH to examine how mode of presentation of a problem influences strategy use and transfer. Undergraduate students (Experiment 1) or Prolific workers (Experiment 2) completed two TOH problems of varying difficulty (4-disk/5disk). They were randomly assigned to different conditions in which problems were either high in internal representation (mental) or high in external representation (computer). Participants were better able to complete problems successfully when external representations were available but completed problems in fewer moves when relying on internal representations. In addition, participants spent more time between moves when solving problems mentally, suggesting that external representations encourage speed while internal representations promote accuracy when solving recursion problems. Lastly, both experiments provide evidence that first solving a problem mentally encouraged participants to use strategies similar to goal recursion on a second problem.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Tracing problem solving in real time: fMRI analysis of the subject-paced tower of Hanoi [J].
Anderson, JR ;
Albert, MV ;
Fincham, JM .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 17 (08) :1261-1274
[2]   PROBLEM-SOLVING AND LEARNING [J].
ANDERSON, JR .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1993, 48 (01) :35-44
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, GIFTED EDUC INT, DOI [DOI 10.1177/026142948600400205, 10.1177/026142948600400205]
[5]   When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer [J].
Barnett, SM ;
Ceci, SJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2002, 128 (04) :612-637
[6]   Constrained interactivity for relating multiple representations in science: When virtual is better than real [J].
Barrett, Trevor J. ;
Stull, Andrew T. ;
Hsu, Ted M. ;
Hegarty, Mary .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2015, 81 :69-81
[7]   INTERDOMAIN TRANSFER BETWEEN ISOMORPHIC TOPICS IN ALGEBRA AND PHYSICS [J].
BASSOK, M ;
HOLYOAK, KJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1989, 15 (01) :153-166
[8]  
Bjrk RA., 1994, METACOGNITION KNOWIN, P185, DOI [10.7551/mitpress/4561.003.0011, DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/4561.003.0011]
[9]   Intelligent problem-solvers externalize cognitive operations [J].
Bocanegra, Bruno R. ;
Poletiek, Fenna H. ;
Ftitache, Bouchra ;
Clarks, Andy .
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 3 (02) :136-142
[10]   Distributing working memory resources during problem solving [J].
Cary, M ;
Carlson, RA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2001, 27 (03) :836-848