Construction Project Risk Assessment Using Combined Fuzzy and FMEA

被引:0
作者
Mohammadi, Amir [1 ]
Tavakolan, Mehdi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Civil Engn, Dept Construct Engn & Management, Tehran, Iran
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 JOINT IFSA WORLD CONGRESS AND NAFIPS ANNUAL MEETING (IFSA/NAFIPS) | 2013年
关键词
FAILURE MODE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Effectively managing risk is an essential element of successful project management. It is imperative that project management team consider all possible risks to establish corrective actions in the right time. So far, several techniques have been proposed for project risk analysis. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) is recognized as one of the most useful techniques in this field. The main goal is identifying all failure modes within a system, assessing their impact, and planning for corrective actions. In traditional FMEA, the risk priorities of failure modes are determined by using Risk Priority Numbers (RPN), which can be obtained by multiplying the scores of risk factors like occurrence (O), severity (S), and detection (D). This technique has some limitations, though in this paper, Fuzzy logic and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) are used to address the limitations of traditional FMEA. Linguistic variables, expressed in fuzzy numbers, are used to assess the ratings of risk factors O, S, and D. Each factor consists of seven membership functions and on the whole there are 343 rules for fuzzy system. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is applied to determine the relative weightings of risk impacts on time, cost, quality and safety. A case study is presented to validate the concept. The feedbacks are showing the advantages of the proposed approach in project risk management.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 237
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Abdelgawad M., 2010, JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCT
  • [2] Al-Subhi Al-Harbi K. M., 2001, International Journal of Project Management, V19, P19, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00038-1
  • [3] Risk Planning and Management for the Panama Canal Expansion Program
    Alarcon, Luis F.
    Ashley, David B.
    de Hanily, Angelique Sucre
    Molenaar, Keith R.
    Ungo, Ricardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2011, 137 (10): : 762 - 771
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, PMBOK GUIDE A GUIDE
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2003, INT J PROJECT MANAG, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00017-0
  • [6] An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis
    Bowles, JB
    [J]. ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2003 PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 380 - 386
  • [7] Carbone T., 2004, ENGINEERING MANAGEME, V16
  • [8] A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment and analysis: construction project risk management system
    Carr, V
    Tah, JHM
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2001, 32 (10-11) : 847 - 857
  • [9] CHAPMAN C.B., 2003, PROJECT RISK MANAGEM
  • [10] Risk identification and assessment for build-operate-transfer projects: A fuzzy multi attribute decision making model
    Ebrahimnejad, Sadoullah
    Mousavi, Seyed Meysam
    Seyrafianpour, Hamed
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (01) : 575 - 586