A systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures used in gout: an evaluation of their content and measurement properties

被引:8
|
作者
Janssen, Carly A. [1 ]
Voshaar, Martijn A. H. Oude [1 ]
ten Klooster, Peter M. [1 ]
Jansen, Tim L. Th. A. [2 ]
Vonkeman, Harald E. [1 ,3 ]
van de Laar, Mart A. F. J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Dept Psychol Hlth & Technol, POB 217, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] VieCuri Med Ctr, Dept Rheumatol, Venlo, Netherlands
[3] Med Spectrum Twente, Dept Rheumatol & Clin Immunol, Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Gout; Patient reported outcomes; Measurement properties; systematic literature review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE DISABILITY INDEX; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION; MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; OMERACT FILTER; HEALTH; VALIDITY; IMPACT; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-019-1125-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Gout is a common, monosodium urate crystal-driven inflammatory arthritis. Besides its clinical manifestations, patients often also suffer from pain, physical impairment, emotional distress and work productivity loss, as a result of the disease. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used to assess these consequences of the disease. However, current instrument endorsements for measuring such outcomes in acute and chronic gout clinical settings are based on limited psychometric evidence. The objective of this systematic literature review was to identify currently available PROMs for gout, and to critically evaluate their content and psychometric properties, in order to evaluate the current status regarding PROMs for use in gout patients. Methods: Systematic literature searches were performed in the PubMed and EMBASE databases. The methodological quality of included papers was appraised using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist, and evaluation of measurement properties (reliability, responsiveness, construct validity, floor and ceiling effects) was done in accordance with published quality criteria. Item content was appraised by linking health concepts to the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Results: In total, 13 PROMs were identified, of which three were targeted specifically at gout patients. The majority of the PROMs were rated positively for content validity. For most instruments, limited evidence was available for construct validity and reliability. Instruments to assess pain scored well on responsiveness and floor and ceiling effects, but not much is known about their reliability in gout. Conclusions: The physical functioning subscale of the SF-36v2 (Short Form-36 item version 2) is the only PROM that had sufficient supporting evidence for all its psychometric properties. Many of the commonly used PROMs in gout are currently not yet well supported and more studies on their measurement properties are needed among both acute and chronic gout populations.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Angioedema: A Literature Review
    Brix, Anna Trier Heiberg
    Boysen, Henrik Balle
    Weller, Karsten
    Caballero, Teresa
    Bygum, Anette
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101
  • [42] Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
    Sharma, Garima
    Chiva-Razavi, Sima
    Viriato, Daniel
    Naujoks, Christel
    Patalano, Francesco
    Bentley, Sarah
    Findley, Amy
    Johnson, Chloe
    Arbuckle, Rob
    Wolffsohn, James
    BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 5 (01):
  • [43] Patient-reported Outcome Measurement and Reporting for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review
    Motzer, Robert J.
    Rane, Pratik P.
    Saretsky, Todd L.
    Pawar, Deepshikha
    Nguyen, Allison Martin
    Sundaram, Murali
    Burgents, Joseph
    Pandey, Rishabh
    Rudell, Katja
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 84 (04) : 406 - 417
  • [44] Patient-reported outcome measures for life participation in kidney transplantation: A systematic review
    Ju, Angela
    Chow, Bi Yang
    Ralph, Angelique F.
    Howell, Martin
    Josephson, Michelle A.
    Ahn, Curie
    Butt, Zeeshan
    Dobbels, Fabienne
    Fowler, Kevin
    Jowsey-Gregoire, Sheila
    Jha, Vivekanand
    Locke, Jayme E.
    Tan, Jane C.
    Taylor, Quinetta
    Rutherford, Claudia
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Tong, Allison
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 19 (08) : 2306 - 2317
  • [45] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures in radiotherapy-induced trismus
    Assas, Motaz
    Wiriyakijja, Paswach
    Fedele, Stefano
    Porter, Stephen
    Riordain, Richeal Ni
    JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2019, 48 (05) : 351 - 357
  • [46] Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Positive Psychosocial Constructs in Children and Adolescent/Young Adults with Cancer: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Wayant, Cole
    Bixler, Kaylea
    Garrett, Morgan
    Mack, Jennifer W.
    Wright, Drew
    Vassar, Matt
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11 (01) : 78 - 94
  • [47] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review protocol
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Kyte, Derek
    Cockwell, Paul
    Marshall, Tom
    Keeley, Thomas
    Gheorghe, Adrian
    Calvert, Melanie
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (10):
  • [48] Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures, measuring fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis, a systematic review
    Ruzzi, Miguel Angel Jorquera
    Coll, Marti Boix
    Mata, Maria Jose Dura
    Tello, Maria Cristina Ramo
    Garcia, Irma Casas
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2024, 92
  • [49] Patient-reported outcome measures for retinoblastoma: a scoping review
    Janic, Ana
    Bowden, Sylvie
    Levy, Sarah
    Stinson, Jennifer
    Dimaras, Helen
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [50] Patient-reported outcome measures in individuals with amelogenesis imperfecta: a systematic review
    Appelstrand, S. B.
    Robertson, A.
    Sabel, N.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 23 (06) : 885 - 895