Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the 6-minute Walk Distance in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Surgery

被引:6
|
作者
Takenaka, Hiroto [1 ,2 ]
Kamiya, Mitsuhiro [3 ]
Sugiura, Hideshi [2 ]
Nishihama, Kasuri [1 ]
Ito, Atsuki [1 ]
Suzuki, Junya [1 ]
Hanamura, Shuntaro [3 ]
机构
[1] Asahi Hosp, Dept Rehabil, 2090 Higashino Cho, Kasugai, Aichi 4860819, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ, Dept Phys & Occupat Therapy, Grad Sch Med, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Asahi Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Kasugai, Aichi, Japan
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2022年 / 35卷 / 03期
关键词
lumbar spinal canal stenosis; 6-minute walk distance; walking ability; minimum clinically important difference; minimum detectable change; Oswestry Disability Index; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FUSION; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTORS; CAPACITY; OUTCOMES; PAIN;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001196
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the responsiveness of the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and determine the threshold of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the 6MWD in patients who underwent surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) surgery. Summary of Background Data: The 6MWD rapidly and objectively assesses the walking distance in patients with LSS. To date, no study has assessed the MCID in the 6MWD in patients who underwent LSS surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 41 patients (16 women; average age: 69.4 y, SD: 7.8 y) were included and assessed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. We evaluated the 6MWD and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which is a health-related patientrReported outcome, used as an anchor to calculate the MCID for in the 6MWD. We used 2 different approaches to examine the responsiveness of the 6MWD: internal and external responsiveness. The external responsiveness was assessed in 2 ways: one based on the anchoring questionnaire and the other based on the scale distribution of the scale. The anchor-based approach was evaluated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and the receiver operating characteristic curve. The distribution-based approach was evaluated using the minimal detectable change. Results: The ODI scores and 6MWD for each anchor significantly improved postoperatively. The correlation coefficient between changes in the 6MWD and ODI was r=-0.58. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the ODI anchor was 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.89), and the cutoff value for the ODI anchor was 50 m (sensitivity=0.57, specificity=0.71). In the distribution-based approach, the minimal detectable change for the 6MWD was 105.9 m. Conclusions: Both the internal and the external responsiveness of the 6MWD were validated using the ODI. Therefore, the MCID in the 6MWD in patients undergoing LSS surgery ranges from 50 to 105.9 m.
引用
收藏
页码:E345 / E350
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Six-Minute-Walk Test in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Test Validation and Minimal Clinically Important Difference
    du Bois, Roland M.
    Weycker, Derek
    Albera, Carlo
    Bradford, Williamson Z.
    Costabel, Ulrich
    Kartashov, Alex
    Lancaster, Lisa
    Noble, Paul W.
    Sahn, Steven A.
    Szwarcberg, Javier
    Thomeer, Michiel
    Valeyre, Dominique
    King, Talmadge E., Jr.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 183 (09) : 1231 - 1237
  • [42] Prospective Registration Study for Establishing Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Spinal Metastases
    Hirota, Ryosuke
    Oshigiri, Tsutomu
    Iesato, Noriyuki
    Emori, Makoto
    Teramoto, Atsushi
    Shiratani, Yuki
    Suzuki, Akinobu
    Terai, Hidetomi
    Shimizu, Takaki
    Kakutani, Kenichiro
    Kanda, Yutaro
    Tominaga, Hiroyuki
    Kawamura, Ichiro
    Ishihara, Masayuki
    Paku, Masaaki
    Takahashi, Yohei
    Funayama, Toru
    Miura, Kousei
    Shirasawa, Eiki
    Inoue, Hirokazu
    Kimura, Atsushi
    Iimura, Takuya
    Moridaira, Hiroshi
    Nakajima, Hideaki
    Watanabe, Shuji
    Akeda, Koji
    Takegami, Norihiko
    Nakanishi, Kazuo
    Sawada, Hirokatsu
    Matsumoto, Koji
    Funaba, Masahiro
    Suzuki, Hidenori
    Funao, Haruki
    Hirai, Takashi
    Otsuki, Bungo
    Kobayakawa, Kazu
    Uotani, Koji
    Manabe, Hiroaki
    Tanishima, Shinji
    Hashimoto, Ko
    Iwai, Chizuo
    Yamabe, Daisuke
    Hiyama, Akihiko
    Seki, Shoji
    Goto, Yuta
    Miyazaki, Masashi
    Watanabe, Kazuyuki
    Nakamae, Toshio
    Kaito, Takashi
    Nakashima, Hiroaki
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (22) : 1539 - 1547
  • [43] The Long-Term Prognostic Significance of 6-Minute Walk Test Distance in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
    Ingle, Lee
    Cleland, John G.
    Clark, Andrew L.
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [44] Reaching minimal clinically important difference in adult spinal deformity surgery: a comparison of patients from North America and Japan
    Arima, Hideyuki
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Bridwell, Keith
    Yamato, Yu
    Yagi, Mitsuru
    Watanabe, Kota
    Matsumoto, Morio
    Inami, Satoshi
    Taneichi, Hiroshi
    Matsuyama, Yukihiro
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2020, 32 (06) : 859 - 864
  • [45] 6-Minute walk test predicts prolonged hospitalization in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair by MitraClip
    Saji, Mike
    Katz, Marc R.
    Ailawadi, Gorav
    Welch, Timothy S.
    Fowler, Dale E.
    Kennedy, Jamie L. W.
    Bergin, James D.
    Kuntjoro, Ivandito
    Dent, John M.
    Ragosta, Michael
    Lim, D. Scott
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 92 (03) : 566 - 573
  • [46] Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Among Patients With Frozen Shoulder
    Kim, Sun Woo
    Lim, Ji Young
    Kim, Seonghee
    Do, Jong Geol
    Lee, Jong In
    Hwang, Ji Hye
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2024, 78 (04)
  • [47] THE 6-MINUTE WALK TEST AND OTHER CLINICAL ENDPOINTS IN DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: RELIABILITY, CONCURRENT VALIDITY, AND MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES FROM A MULTICENTER STUDY
    McDonald, Craig M.
    Henricson, Erik K.
    Abresch, R. Ted
    Florence, Julaine
    Eagle, Michelle
    Gappmaier, Eduard
    Glanzman, Allan M.
    Spiegel, Robert
    Barth, Jay
    Elfring, Gary
    Reha, Allen
    Peltz, Stuart W.
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2013, 48 (03) : 357 - 368
  • [48] Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation
    Chen, Poyu
    Lin, Keh-Chung
    Liing, Rong-Jiuan
    Wu, Ching-Yi
    Chen, Chia-Ling
    Chang, Ku-Chou
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (06) : 1585 - 1596
  • [49] Minimally Invasive Spinal Deformity Surgery: Analysis of Patients Who Fail to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Uribe, Juan
    Mummaneni, Praveen, V
    Tran, Stacie
    Brusko, G. Damian
    Park, Paul
    Nunley, Pierce
    Kanter, Adam
    Okonkwo, David
    Anand, Neel
    Chou, Dean
    Shaffrey, Christopher, I
    Fu, Kai-Ming
    Mundis, Gregory M.
    Eastlack, Robert
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 137 : E499 - E505
  • [50] Perioperative Predictors in Patients Undergoing Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement
    Nie, James W.
    Hartman, Timothy J.
    Oyetayo, Omolabake O.
    MacGregor, Keith R.
    Zheng, Eileen
    Federico, Vincent P.
    Massel, Dustin H.
    Sayari, Arash J.
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 175 : E914 - E924