Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the 6-minute Walk Distance in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Surgery

被引:6
|
作者
Takenaka, Hiroto [1 ,2 ]
Kamiya, Mitsuhiro [3 ]
Sugiura, Hideshi [2 ]
Nishihama, Kasuri [1 ]
Ito, Atsuki [1 ]
Suzuki, Junya [1 ]
Hanamura, Shuntaro [3 ]
机构
[1] Asahi Hosp, Dept Rehabil, 2090 Higashino Cho, Kasugai, Aichi 4860819, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ, Dept Phys & Occupat Therapy, Grad Sch Med, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Asahi Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Kasugai, Aichi, Japan
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2022年 / 35卷 / 03期
关键词
lumbar spinal canal stenosis; 6-minute walk distance; walking ability; minimum clinically important difference; minimum detectable change; Oswestry Disability Index; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FUSION; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTORS; CAPACITY; OUTCOMES; PAIN;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001196
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the responsiveness of the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and determine the threshold of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the 6MWD in patients who underwent surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) surgery. Summary of Background Data: The 6MWD rapidly and objectively assesses the walking distance in patients with LSS. To date, no study has assessed the MCID in the 6MWD in patients who underwent LSS surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 41 patients (16 women; average age: 69.4 y, SD: 7.8 y) were included and assessed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. We evaluated the 6MWD and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which is a health-related patientrReported outcome, used as an anchor to calculate the MCID for in the 6MWD. We used 2 different approaches to examine the responsiveness of the 6MWD: internal and external responsiveness. The external responsiveness was assessed in 2 ways: one based on the anchoring questionnaire and the other based on the scale distribution of the scale. The anchor-based approach was evaluated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and the receiver operating characteristic curve. The distribution-based approach was evaluated using the minimal detectable change. Results: The ODI scores and 6MWD for each anchor significantly improved postoperatively. The correlation coefficient between changes in the 6MWD and ODI was r=-0.58. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the ODI anchor was 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.89), and the cutoff value for the ODI anchor was 50 m (sensitivity=0.57, specificity=0.71). In the distribution-based approach, the minimal detectable change for the 6MWD was 105.9 m. Conclusions: Both the internal and the external responsiveness of the 6MWD were validated using the ODI. Therefore, the MCID in the 6MWD in patients undergoing LSS surgery ranges from 50 to 105.9 m.
引用
收藏
页码:E345 / E350
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quality of life assessed with EQ-5D in patients undergoing glioma surgery: What is the responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference?
    Lisa Millgård Sagberg
    Asgeir S. Jakola
    Ole Solheim
    Quality of Life Research, 2014, 23 : 1427 - 1434
  • [32] Investigating minimal clinically important difference for Constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery
    Kukkonen, Juha
    Kauko, Tommi
    Vahlberg, Tero
    Joukainen, Antti
    Aarimaa, Ville
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2013, 22 (12) : 1650 - 1655
  • [33] Quality of life assessed with EQ-5D in patients undergoing glioma surgery: What is the responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference?
    Sagberg, Lisa Millgard
    Jakola, Asgeir S.
    Solheim, Ole
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (05) : 1427 - 1434
  • [34] Validating the 6-minute walk test as an indicator of recovery in patients undergoing cardiac surgery A prospective cohort study
    Chen, Yueh-Chi
    Chen, Kun-Chung
    Lu, Li-Hua
    Wu, Yi-Liang
    Lai, Te-Jen
    Wang, Chun-Hou
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (42)
  • [35] Determining minimal clinically important difference estimates following surgery for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine: analysis of the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) registry
    Power, J. Denise
    Perruccio, Anthony, V
    Canizares, Mayilee
    Mcintosh, Greg
    Abraham, Edward
    Attabib, Najmedden
    Bailey, Christopher S.
    Charest-Morin, Raphaele
    Dea, Nicholas
    Finkelstein, Joel
    Fisher, Charles
    Glennie, R. Andrew
    Hall, Hamilton
    Johnson, Michael G.
    Kelly, Adrienne M.
    Kingwell, Stephen
    Manson, Neil
    Nataraj, Andrew
    Paquet, Jerome
    Singh, Supriya
    Soroceanu, Alex
    Thomas, Kenneth C.
    Weber, Michael H.
    Rampersaud, Y. Raja
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (09) : 1323 - 1333
  • [36] Reference value of 6-minute walk distance in patients with sub-acute stroke
    Kubo, Hiroki
    Nozoe, Masafumi
    Kanai, Masashi
    Furuichi, Asami
    Onishi, Akira
    Kajimoto, Kazuki
    Mase, Kyoshi
    Shimada, Shinichi
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2020, 27 (05) : 337 - 343
  • [37] Radiographic predictors of reaching minimal clinically important difference following lumbar fusion surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Wang, Dongfan
    Chen, Xiaolong
    Han, Di
    Wang, Wei
    Kong, Chao
    Lu, Shibao
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (05) : 1786 - 1795
  • [38] Impact of Lumbar Surgery on Pharmacological Treatment for Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Imai, Takaya
    Nagai, Sota
    Michikawa, Takehiro
    Inagaki, Risa
    Kawabata, Soya
    Ito, Kaori
    Hachiya, Kurenai
    Takeda, Hiroki
    Ikeda, Daiki
    Yamada, Shigeki
    Fujita, Nobuyuki
    Kaneko, Shinjiro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (06)
  • [39] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients
    Henrik H Lauridsen
    Jan Hartvigsen
    Claus Manniche
    Lars Korsholm
    Niels Grunnet-Nilsson
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 7
  • [40] Minimal clinically important difference in patients who underwent decompression alone for lumbar degenerative disease
    Nakarai, Hiroyuki
    Kato, So
    Kawamura, Naohiro
    Higashikawa, Akiro
    Takeshita, Yujiro
    Fukushima, Masayoshi
    Ono, Takashi
    Hara, Nobuhiro
    Azuma, Seiichi
    Tanaka, Sakae
    Oshima, Yasushi
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (04) : 549 - 560