Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the 6-minute Walk Distance in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Surgery

被引:6
|
作者
Takenaka, Hiroto [1 ,2 ]
Kamiya, Mitsuhiro [3 ]
Sugiura, Hideshi [2 ]
Nishihama, Kasuri [1 ]
Ito, Atsuki [1 ]
Suzuki, Junya [1 ]
Hanamura, Shuntaro [3 ]
机构
[1] Asahi Hosp, Dept Rehabil, 2090 Higashino Cho, Kasugai, Aichi 4860819, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ, Dept Phys & Occupat Therapy, Grad Sch Med, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Asahi Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Kasugai, Aichi, Japan
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2022年 / 35卷 / 03期
关键词
lumbar spinal canal stenosis; 6-minute walk distance; walking ability; minimum clinically important difference; minimum detectable change; Oswestry Disability Index; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FUSION; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTORS; CAPACITY; OUTCOMES; PAIN;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001196
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the responsiveness of the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and determine the threshold of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the 6MWD in patients who underwent surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) surgery. Summary of Background Data: The 6MWD rapidly and objectively assesses the walking distance in patients with LSS. To date, no study has assessed the MCID in the 6MWD in patients who underwent LSS surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 41 patients (16 women; average age: 69.4 y, SD: 7.8 y) were included and assessed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. We evaluated the 6MWD and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which is a health-related patientrReported outcome, used as an anchor to calculate the MCID for in the 6MWD. We used 2 different approaches to examine the responsiveness of the 6MWD: internal and external responsiveness. The external responsiveness was assessed in 2 ways: one based on the anchoring questionnaire and the other based on the scale distribution of the scale. The anchor-based approach was evaluated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and the receiver operating characteristic curve. The distribution-based approach was evaluated using the minimal detectable change. Results: The ODI scores and 6MWD for each anchor significantly improved postoperatively. The correlation coefficient between changes in the 6MWD and ODI was r=-0.58. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the ODI anchor was 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.89), and the cutoff value for the ODI anchor was 50 m (sensitivity=0.57, specificity=0.71). In the distribution-based approach, the minimal detectable change for the 6MWD was 105.9 m. Conclusions: Both the internal and the external responsiveness of the 6MWD were validated using the ODI. Therefore, the MCID in the 6MWD in patients undergoing LSS surgery ranges from 50 to 105.9 m.
引用
收藏
页码:E345 / E350
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimal important difference and responsiveness of 2-minute walk test performance in people with COPD undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation
    Johnston, Kylie Nicole
    Potter, Adrian James
    Phillips, Anna Caroline
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2017, 12 : 2849 - 2857
  • [22] Determinants of 6-minute walk distance in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis undergoing lung transplant evaluation
    Porteous, Mary K.
    Rivera-Lebron, Belinda N.
    Kreider, Maryl
    Lee, James
    Kawut, Steven M.
    PULMONARY CIRCULATION, 2016, 6 (01) : 30 - 36
  • [23] CPAP Increases 6-Minute Walk Distance After Lung Resection Surgery
    Nery, Flavio P. O. S.
    Lopes, Agnaldo J.
    Domingos, Denise N.
    Cunha, Renato F.
    Peixoto, Marcia G.
    Higa, Claudio
    Nunes, Rodolfo A.
    Saito, Eduardo H.
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2012, 57 (03) : 363 - 369
  • [24] The Return of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for 6-Minute-Walk Distance in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    Holland, Anne E.
    Nici, Linda
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 187 (04) : 335 - 336
  • [25] Longitudinal Changes in Handgrip Strength, Hyperinflation, and 6-Minute Walk Distance in Patients With COPD and a Control Group
    Cortopassi, Felipe
    Celli, Bartolome
    Divo, Miguel
    Pinto-Plata, Victor
    CHEST, 2015, 148 (04) : 986 - 994
  • [26] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke
    Chen, Chia-Ling
    Chen, Chung-Yao
    Chen, Hsieh-Ching
    Wu, Ching-Yi
    Lin, Keh-Chung
    Hsieh, Yu-Wei
    Shen, I-Hsuan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2019, 55 (06) : 754 - 760
  • [27] Minimally Important Difference of the 20-m 6-Minute Walk Test in Individuals With COPD
    Klein, Suelen R.
    Munari, Anelise B.
    Karloh, Manuela
    Mucha, Francieli C.
    Silva, Isabela J. C. S.
    Mayer, Anamaria F.
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2023, 68 (11) : 1546 - 1552
  • [28] Reliability, agreement, and responsiveness of a 6-minute walk/run test in patients with heart disease
    Berghmans, Danielle D.
    Lenssen, Antoine F.
    Bastiaenen, Carolien H.
    Ilhan, Mustafa
    Lencer, Nicole H.
    Roox, George M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (01) : 135 - 141
  • [29] Updating the Minimal Important Difference for Six-Minute Walk Distance in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    Holland, Anne E.
    Hill, Catherine J.
    Rasekaba, Tshepo
    Lee, Annemarie
    Naughton, Matthew T.
    McDonald, Christine F.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 91 (02): : 221 - 225
  • [30] Prognostic Value of Walk Distance, Work, Oxygen Saturation, and Dyspnea During 6-Minute Walk Test in COPD Patients
    Golpe, Rafael
    Perez-de-Llano, Luis A.
    Mendez-Marote, Lidia
    Veres-Racamonde, Alejandro
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2013, 58 (08) : 1329 - 1334