Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the 6-minute Walk Distance in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Surgery

被引:7
作者
Takenaka, Hiroto [1 ,2 ]
Kamiya, Mitsuhiro [3 ]
Sugiura, Hideshi [2 ]
Nishihama, Kasuri [1 ]
Ito, Atsuki [1 ]
Suzuki, Junya [1 ]
Hanamura, Shuntaro [3 ]
机构
[1] Asahi Hosp, Dept Rehabil, 2090 Higashino Cho, Kasugai, Aichi 4860819, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ, Dept Phys & Occupat Therapy, Grad Sch Med, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Asahi Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Kasugai, Aichi, Japan
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2022年 / 35卷 / 03期
关键词
lumbar spinal canal stenosis; 6-minute walk distance; walking ability; minimum clinically important difference; minimum detectable change; Oswestry Disability Index; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FUSION; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTORS; CAPACITY; OUTCOMES; PAIN;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001196
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the responsiveness of the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and determine the threshold of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the 6MWD in patients who underwent surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) surgery. Summary of Background Data: The 6MWD rapidly and objectively assesses the walking distance in patients with LSS. To date, no study has assessed the MCID in the 6MWD in patients who underwent LSS surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 41 patients (16 women; average age: 69.4 y, SD: 7.8 y) were included and assessed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. We evaluated the 6MWD and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which is a health-related patientrReported outcome, used as an anchor to calculate the MCID for in the 6MWD. We used 2 different approaches to examine the responsiveness of the 6MWD: internal and external responsiveness. The external responsiveness was assessed in 2 ways: one based on the anchoring questionnaire and the other based on the scale distribution of the scale. The anchor-based approach was evaluated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and the receiver operating characteristic curve. The distribution-based approach was evaluated using the minimal detectable change. Results: The ODI scores and 6MWD for each anchor significantly improved postoperatively. The correlation coefficient between changes in the 6MWD and ODI was r=-0.58. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the ODI anchor was 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.89), and the cutoff value for the ODI anchor was 50 m (sensitivity=0.57, specificity=0.71). In the distribution-based approach, the minimal detectable change for the 6MWD was 105.9 m. Conclusions: Both the internal and the external responsiveness of the 6MWD were validated using the ODI. Therefore, the MCID in the 6MWD in patients undergoing LSS surgery ranges from 50 to 105.9 m.
引用
收藏
页码:E345 / E350
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis -: Systematic review [J].
Aalto, Timo J. ;
Malmivaara, Antti ;
Kovacs, Francisco ;
Herno, Arto ;
Alen, Markku ;
Salmi, Liisa ;
Kroger, Heikki ;
Andrade, Juan ;
Jimenez, Rosa ;
Tapaninaho, Antti ;
Turunen, Veli ;
Savolainen, Sakari ;
Airaksinen, Olavi .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (18) :E648-E663
[2]   Epidural Corticosteroid Injections for Radiculopathy and Spinal Stenosis A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Chou, Roger ;
Hashimoto, Robin ;
Friedly, Janna ;
Fu, Rongwei ;
Bougatsos, Christina ;
Dana, Tracy ;
Sullivan, Sean D. ;
Jarvik, Jeffrey .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 163 (05) :373-U133
[3]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[4]   Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales [J].
Copay, Anne G. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Subach, Brian R. ;
Berven, Sigurd ;
Schuler, Thomas C. ;
Carreon, Leah Y. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (06) :968-974
[5]   Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods [J].
Copay, Anne G. ;
Subach, Brian R. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Polly, David W., Jr. ;
Schuler, Thomas C. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 7 (05) :541-546
[6]   ATS statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test [J].
Crapo, RO ;
Casaburi, R ;
Coates, AL ;
Enright, PL ;
MacIntyre, NR ;
McKay, RT ;
Johnson, D ;
Wanger, JS ;
Zeballos, RJ ;
Bittner, V ;
Mottram, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 166 (01) :111-117
[7]   A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [J].
Forsth, Peter ;
Olafsson, Gylfi ;
Carlsson, Thomas ;
Frost, Anders ;
Borgstrom, Fredrik ;
Fritzell, Peter ;
Ohagen, Patrik ;
Michaelsson, Karl ;
Sanden, Bengt .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 374 (15) :1413-1423
[8]   Bone Union Rate With Autologous Iliac Bone Versus Local Bone Graft in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion [J].
Ito, Zenya ;
Matsuyama, Yukihiro ;
Sakai, Yoshihito ;
Imagama, Shiro ;
Wakao, Norimitsu ;
Ando, Kei ;
Hirano, Kenichi ;
Tauchi, Ryoji ;
Muramoto, Akio ;
Matsui, Hiroki ;
Matsumoto, Tomohiro ;
Kanemura, Tokumi ;
Yoshida, Go ;
Ishikawa, Yoshimoto ;
Ishiguro, Naoki .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (21) :E1101-E1105
[9]   Correlation between the Oswestry Disability Index and objective measurements of walking capacity and performance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review [J].
Jespersen, Annette Bennedsgaard ;
Gustafsson, Malin Eleonora Av Kak .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (07) :1604-1613
[10]   Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics [J].
Kanda, Y. .
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 48 (03) :452-458