Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the 6-minute Walk Distance in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Surgery

被引:6
|
作者
Takenaka, Hiroto [1 ,2 ]
Kamiya, Mitsuhiro [3 ]
Sugiura, Hideshi [2 ]
Nishihama, Kasuri [1 ]
Ito, Atsuki [1 ]
Suzuki, Junya [1 ]
Hanamura, Shuntaro [3 ]
机构
[1] Asahi Hosp, Dept Rehabil, 2090 Higashino Cho, Kasugai, Aichi 4860819, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ, Dept Phys & Occupat Therapy, Grad Sch Med, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Asahi Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Kasugai, Aichi, Japan
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2022年 / 35卷 / 03期
关键词
lumbar spinal canal stenosis; 6-minute walk distance; walking ability; minimum clinically important difference; minimum detectable change; Oswestry Disability Index; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; FUSION; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTORS; CAPACITY; OUTCOMES; PAIN;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001196
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the responsiveness of the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and determine the threshold of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the 6MWD in patients who underwent surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) surgery. Summary of Background Data: The 6MWD rapidly and objectively assesses the walking distance in patients with LSS. To date, no study has assessed the MCID in the 6MWD in patients who underwent LSS surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 41 patients (16 women; average age: 69.4 y, SD: 7.8 y) were included and assessed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. We evaluated the 6MWD and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which is a health-related patientrReported outcome, used as an anchor to calculate the MCID for in the 6MWD. We used 2 different approaches to examine the responsiveness of the 6MWD: internal and external responsiveness. The external responsiveness was assessed in 2 ways: one based on the anchoring questionnaire and the other based on the scale distribution of the scale. The anchor-based approach was evaluated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and the receiver operating characteristic curve. The distribution-based approach was evaluated using the minimal detectable change. Results: The ODI scores and 6MWD for each anchor significantly improved postoperatively. The correlation coefficient between changes in the 6MWD and ODI was r=-0.58. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the ODI anchor was 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.89), and the cutoff value for the ODI anchor was 50 m (sensitivity=0.57, specificity=0.71). In the distribution-based approach, the minimal detectable change for the 6MWD was 105.9 m. Conclusions: Both the internal and the external responsiveness of the 6MWD were validated using the ODI. Therefore, the MCID in the 6MWD in patients undergoing LSS surgery ranges from 50 to 105.9 m.
引用
收藏
页码:E345 / E350
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the 6-Minute Walk Distance in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Surgery: 12 Months Follow-Up
    Takenaka, Hiroto
    Kamiya, Mitsuhiro
    Sugiura, Hideshi
    Nishihama, Kasuri
    Suzuki, Junya
    Hanamura, Shuntaro
    SPINE, 2023, 48 (08) : 559 - 566
  • [2] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the 6-minute walk distance in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery
    Yanagisawa, Takuya
    Tatematsu, Noriatsu
    Horiuchi, Mioko
    Migitaka, Saki
    Yasuda, Shotaro
    Itatsu, Keita
    Kubota, Tomoyuki
    Sugiura, Hideshi
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2024, 32 (06)
  • [3] Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for 6-Minute Walk Distance in Fibromyalgia
    Kaleth, Anthony S.
    Slaven, James E.
    Ang, Dennis C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2016, 95 (10) : 738 - 745
  • [4] Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the 6-Minute Walk Test in People With Stroke
    Fulk, George D.
    He, Ying
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2018, 42 (04): : 235 - 240
  • [5] Predictors of achieving minimal clinically important difference in functional status for elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing lumbar decompression and fusion surgery
    Hou, Xiaofei
    Hu, Hailiang
    Cui, Peng
    Kong, Chao
    Wang, Wei
    Lu, Shibao
    BMC SURGERY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [6] Minimal clinically important difference in 6-minute walk distance estimated by multiple methods in inpatients with subacute cardiovascular disease
    Igarashi, Tatsuya
    Miyata, Kazuhiro
    Tamura, Shuntaro
    Otani, Tomohiro
    Iizuka, Takamitsu
    Usuda, Shigeru
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2024, 40 (09) : 1981 - 1989
  • [7] Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the 6-minute-walk Distance for Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
    Moutchia, Jude
    McClelland, Robyn L.
    Al-Naamani, Nadine
    Appleby, Dina H.
    Blank, Kristina
    Grinnan, Dan
    Holmes, John H.
    Mathai, Stephen C.
    Minhas, Jasleen
    Ventetuolo, Corey E.
    Zamanian, Roham T.
    Kawut, Steven M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 207 (08) : 1070 - 1079
  • [8] The Minimal Important Difference in the 6-Minute Walk Test for Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
    Mathai, Stephen C.
    Puhan, Milo A.
    Lam, Diana
    Wise, Robert A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 186 (05) : 428 - 433
  • [9] Construct Validity and Minimal Important Difference of 6-Minute Walk Distance in Survivors of Acute Respiratory Failure
    Chan, Kitty S.
    Pfoh, Elizabeth R.
    Denehy, Linda
    Elliott, Doug
    Holland, Anne E.
    Dinglas, Victor D.
    Needham, Dale M.
    CHEST, 2015, 147 (05) : 1316 - 1326
  • [10] Validation of test performance characteristics and minimal clinically important difference of the 6-minute walk test in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
    Nathan, Steven D.
    du Bois, Roland M.
    Albera, Carlo
    Bradford, Williamson Z.
    Costabel, Ulrich
    Kartashov, Alex
    Noble, Paul W.
    Sahn, Steven A.
    Valeyre, Dominique
    Weycker, Derek
    King, Talmadge E., Jr.
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 109 (07) : 914 - 922