Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing

被引:118
作者
Fan, Yumei [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Jinfen [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent China Normal Univ, Sch Foreign Languages, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Foreign Languages, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Student engagement; Peer feedback; L2; writing;
D O I
10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100775
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
While the past few decades have witnessed enormous growth in research on peer feedback in second and foreign language (L2) writing, little attention has been paid to student engagement with peer feedback. Drawing on multiple methodologies, we explored how 21 university EFL students engaged with peer feedback on L2 writing affectively, behaviorally, and cognitively. We collected multiple sources of data, including audio-recorded peer feedback sessions, students' composition drafts, written peer feedback, semi-structured interviews, and a questionnaire survey. Findings showed that student engagement with peer feedback differed depending on the type of feedback. Overall, students had positive affective engagement and extensive behavioral and cognitive engagement with the form-focused feedback but showed a tendency of low cognitive and behavioral engagement with the content-focused feedback. Additionally, the study revealed a complex relationship within the sub-constructs of and among the three engagement dimensions, manifested in the form of interconnectedness and inconsistencies. We discuss pedagogical implications about how to enhance student engagement with peer feedback.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   The impact of second language proficiency in dyadic peer feedback [J].
Allen, David ;
Mills, Amy .
LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2016, 20 (04) :498-513
[2]  
Ashwell T., 2000, J SECOND LANG WRIT, V9, P227, DOI 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8
[3]  
Bitchener J., 2012, Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203832400
[4]   Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used [J].
Cartney, Patricia .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 35 (05) :551-564
[5]   The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing [J].
Chandler, J .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2003, 12 (03) :267-296
[6]  
Connor U., 1994, J SECOND LANG WRIT, V3, DOI [10.1016/1060-3743(94)90019-1, DOI 10.1016/1060-3743(94)90019-1]
[7]  
Diab N.M., 2011, Assessing Writing, V16, P274, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ASW.2011.08.001
[8]   Effects of peer- versus self-editing on students' revision of language errors in revised drafts [J].
Diab, Nuwar Mawlawi .
SYSTEM, 2010, 38 (01) :85-95
[9]   A typology of written corrective feedback types [J].
Ellis, Rod .
ELT JOURNAL, 2009, 63 (02) :97-107
[10]   A Framework for Investigating Oral and Written Corrective Feedback EPILOGUE [J].
Ellis, Rod .
STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2010, 32 (02) :335-349