Cumulative defect (Bebie) curves for frequency-doubling technology perimetry

被引:0
作者
Johnson, CA [1 ]
Spry, PGD [1 ]
机构
[1] Legacy Clin Res & Technol Ctr, Devers Eye Inst, Discoveries Sight Res Labs, Portland, OR 97208 USA
来源
PERIMETRY UPDATE 2002/2003 | 2004年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: Cumulative defect curves have been employed in conventional automated perimetry to permit the subjective classification of diffuse and localized visual field loss. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether a similar procedure Could be developed for frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry. Methods: FDT results from 407 normal subjects between the ages of 18 and 85 years were used to construct cumulative defect (Bebie) curves. After adjusting for the effects of normal aging (normalizing to an 'average' 45-year-old), total deviation values (deviation from the average normal sensitivity) were determined for the 19 stimulus locations of the N-30 full threshold program. The total deviation values were then rank-ordered from the best (most plus, least minus) to worst (least plus, most minus) values and the fifth and 95th percentiles were determined. Results: FDT cumulative defect (Bebie) curves for FDT are remarkably similar in form to those derived for conventional automated perimetry. Clinical examples are presented to illustrate how these curves can be employed to characterize normal, diffuse. localized and mixed visual field properties for FDT. Discussion: Cumulative defect (Bebie) curves for FDT are a useful means of distinguishing diffuse from localized visual field loss.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 12
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry
    Adams, CW
    Bullimore, MA
    Wall, M
    Fingeret, M
    Johnson, CA
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1999, 76 (08) : 582 - 587
  • [2] THE CUMULATIVE DEFECT CURVE - SEPARATION OF LOCAL AND DIFFUSE COMPONENTS OF VISUAL-FIELD DAMAGE
    BEBIE, H
    FLAMMER, J
    BEBIE, T
    [J]. GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1989, 227 (01) : 9 - 12
  • [3] Brusini P, 1998, ACTA OPHTHALMOL SCAN, V76, P23
  • [4] Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with Humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice
    Burnstein, Y
    Ellish, NJ
    Magbalon, M
    Higginbotham, EJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 129 (03) : 328 - 333
  • [5] Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry
    Casson, R
    James, B
    Rubinstein, A
    Ali, H
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 85 (03) : 360 - 362
  • [6] Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss
    Cello, KE
    Nelson-Quigg, JM
    Johnson, CA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 129 (03) : 314 - 322
  • [7] Chan AB, 1997, J GLAUCOMA, V6, P117
  • [8] Seizure-induced neuronal necrosis: Implications for programmed cell death mechanisms
    Fujikawa, DG
    Shinmei, SS
    Cai, BY
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2000, 41 : S9 - S13
  • [9] A NEW DIFFUSE LOSS INDEX FOR ESTIMATING GENERAL GLAUCOMATOUS VISUAL-FIELD DEPRESSION
    FUNKHOUSER, AT
    [J]. DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1991, 77 (01) : 57 - 72
  • [10] Johnson CA, 1997, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V38, P413