Building trust in digital policing: a scoping review of community policing apps

被引:3
作者
Elphick, Camilla [1 ]
Philpot, Richard [2 ]
Zhang, Min [3 ]
Stuart, Avelie [4 ]
Walkington, Zoe [1 ]
Frumkin, Lara A. [1 ]
Pike, Graham [1 ]
Gardner, Kelly [5 ]
Lacey, Mark [5 ]
Levine, Mark [2 ]
Price, Blaine [3 ]
Bandara, Arosha [3 ]
Nuseibeh, Bashar [3 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Sch Psychol & Counselling, Milton Keynes, Bucks, England
[2] Univ Lancaster, Dept Psychol, Lancaster, England
[3] Open Univ, Sch Comp & Commun, Milton Keynes, Bucks, England
[4] Univ Exeter, Dept Psychol, Exeter, Devon, England
[5] Thames Valley Police, Milton Keynes, Bucks, England
[6] Univ Limerick, Lero Irish Software Res Ctr, Limerick, Ireland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Citizen; police; digital communication; trust; privacy; anonymity;
D O I
10.1080/15614263.2020.1861449
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Perceptions of police trustworthiness are linked to citizens' willingness to cooperate with police. Trust can be fostered by introducing accountability mechanisms, or by increasing a shared police/citizen identity, both which can be achieved digitally. Digital mechanisms can also be designed to safeguard, engage, reassure, inform, and empower diverse communities. We systematically scoped 240 existing online citizen-police and relevant third-party communication apps, to examine whether they sought to meet community needs and policing visions. We found that 82% required registration or login details, 55% of those with a reporting mechanism allowed for anonymous reporting, and 10% provided an understandable privacy policy. Police apps were more likely to seek to reassure, safeguard and inform users, while third-party apps were more likely to seek to empower users. As poorly designed apps risk amplifying mistrust and undermining policing efforts, we suggest 12 design considerations to help ensure the development of high quality/fit for purpose Police/Citizen apps.
引用
收藏
页码:1469 / 1491
页数:23
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Abu Dhabi Police, 2020, WE AR ALL POL 3 1 7
  • [2] Adegbile DP, 2017, YALE LAW J, V126, P2222
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, BBC NEWS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, STAT METHODS RATES P, DOI DOI 10.1002/0471445428
  • [5] Applied Webology, 2018, SEB POL DEP 5002004
  • [6] Applied Webology, 2018, HORR COUNT POL DEP 1
  • [7] Applied Webology, 2018, FELLSM POL DEP 1 0 2
  • [8] Bradford B., 2010, TRUST CONFIDENCE POL
  • [9] Policing and social identity: procedural justice, inclusion and cooperation between police and public
    Bradford, Ben
    [J]. POLICING & SOCIETY, 2014, 24 (01) : 22 - 43
  • [10] Brucato B, 2015, SURVEILL SOC, V13, P455