Utilization of CO2 in renewable DME fuel production: A life cycle analysis (LCA)-based case study in China

被引:26
|
作者
Tomatis, Marco [1 ]
Parvez, Ashak Mahmud [1 ,2 ]
Afzal, Muhammad T. [2 ]
Mareta, Sannia [3 ]
Wu, Tao [1 ]
He, Jun [1 ]
He, Tianbiao [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham Ningbo China, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, Ningbo 315100, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Univ New Brunswick, Dept Mech Engn, 15 Dineen Dr, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada
[3] Univ Nottingham Ningbo China, Ctr English Language Educ CELE, Ningbo 315100, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] China Univ Petr East China, Coll Pipeline & Civil Engn, Dept Gas Engn, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
CO2-enhanced gasification; LCA; Bio-DME; Diesel; DME15; Fuel replacement; DIMETHYL ETHER DME; CARBON CAPTURE; RICE STRAW; ENERGY; GASIFICATION; PLANTATIONS; EMISSIONS; BIOMASS; PERFORMANCE; COMBUSTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115627
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This work aimed to evaluate the environmental performance of single-step dimethyl ether (DME) production system through CO2-enhanced gasification of gumwood. The proposed CO2-enhanced gasification based bio-DME production process was compared systematically with the conventional approach in terms of life cycle assessment (LCA) impacts by using SimaPro software. Overall, the LCA results revealed that bio-DME fuel produced from CO2-enhanced process significantly reduced the burden on climate change, toxicity and ecotoxicity by at least 20%. This decrement was mostly attributed to low feedstock consumption, high-energy recovery and CO2 utilization in the CO2-enhanced process. Over 53% contribution in all impact categories were contributed by the gasifier unit, mainly due to its high energy intensity (over 60% of the total energy requirement). Moreover, the effect of replacing diesel by bio-DME or diesel/DME blend as an automotive fuel was assessed in this study. The scenario of using pure DME resulted on significant reductions of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, by 72%, and of its impact on both human health and ecosystem (by 55% and 68%, respectively). The reduction of GHG emissions were caused by the carbon neutrality of bio-DME. Utilization of DME also limited the emissions of carcinogenic particulate such as diesel soot and therefore, decreased the toxicity of traffic emissions. The second scenario was to utilize DME15 (15% DME by wt in diesel) as an automotive fuel. However, only minor decreases, up to 7%, of the environmental impact were observed for DME15 compared to those estimated for pure diesel. Thus, the present study demonstrated that the CO2-enhanced process could greatly reduce GHG emission and environmental burden of DME production compared to the conventional method. Furthermore, bio-DME utilization as fuel for automotive applications can significantly decrease the hazard caused by traffic emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental impact of an agro-waste based polygeneration without and with CO2 storage: Life cycle assessment approach
    Jana, Kuntal
    De, Sudipta
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 216 : 931 - 940
  • [22] Environmental Performance Analysis of Cement Production with CO2 Capture and Storage Technology in a Life-Cycle Perspective
    An, Jing
    Middleton, Richard S.
    Li, Yingnan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [23] Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production
    de Jong, Sierk
    Antonissen, Kay
    Hoefnagels, Ric
    Lonza, Laura
    Wang, Michael
    Faaij, Andre
    Junginger, Martin
    BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2017, 10
  • [24] Estimating life-cycle CO2 emissions of urban road corridor construction: A case study in Xi'an, China
    Li, Di
    Wang, Yuanqing
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    Sun, Sijia
    Gao, Yanan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 255
  • [25] Renewable methanol production based on in situ synergistic utilization of excavated waste and landfill gas: life cycle techno-environmental-economic analysis
    Tang, Jiehong
    Tang, Yuting
    Liu, Hongyu
    Peng, Songbing
    Sun, Ziwei
    Liu, Yuchen
    Deng, Jingmin
    Chen, Weilong
    Ma, Xiaoqian
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 314
  • [26] China's coal power decarbonization via CO2 capture and storage and biomass co-firing: A LCA case study in Inner Mongolia
    Sammarchi, Sergio
    Li, Jia
    Izikowitz, David
    Yang, Qiang
    Xu, Dong
    ENERGY, 2022, 261
  • [27] Is life cycle assessment (LCA) a suitable method for quantitative CO2 saving estimations? the impact of field input on the LCA results for a pure vegetable oil chain
    Chiaramonti, David
    Recchia, Lucia
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2010, 34 (05) : 787 - 797
  • [28] Life cycle analysis of a combined CO2 capture and conversion membrane reactor
    Fang, Jie
    Jin, Xinfang
    Huang, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2018, 549 : 142 - 150
  • [29] LCA of tomato greenhouse production using spatially differentiated life cycle impact assessment indicators: an Albanian case study
    Canaj, Kledja
    Mehmeti, Andi
    Cantore, Vito
    Todorovic, Mladen
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (07) : 6960 - 6970
  • [30] Research on life cycle CO2 emissions of energy carriers in China
    Sun, B. X.
    Nie, Z. R.
    Liu, Y.
    Gong, X. Z.
    Gao, F.
    Wang, Z. H.
    MATERIALS RESEARCH INNOVATIONS, 2014, 18 : 56 - 61