Meta-Analysis Comparing Culprit-Only Versus Complete Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

被引:2
作者
Ullah, Waqas [1 ]
Zahid, Salman [2 ]
Nadeem, Nayab [1 ]
Gowda, Smitha [3 ]
Munir, Samavia [1 ]
Saleem, Sameer [4 ]
Alraies, M. Chadi [5 ]
Alam, Mahboob [6 ]
Fischman, David L. [7 ]
机构
[1] Abington Jefferson Hlth, Abington, PA 19001 USA
[2] Rochester Gen Hosp, Rochester, NY 14621 USA
[3] Univ South Dakota, Vermillion, SD USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Bowling Green, KY USA
[5] Detroit Med Ctr, Detroit, MI USA
[6] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; COMPLETE REVASCULARIZATION; DISEASE; VESSEL; LESION; STEMI;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients with concomitant multivessel coronary artery disease is associated with poor prognosis. We sought to determine the merits of percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit-only revascularization (COR) compared with multivessel revascularization (MVR) approach. Multiple databases were queried to identify relevant articles. Data were analyzed using a random-effect model to calculate unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and relative risk. A total of 28 studies comprising 26,892 patients, 18,377 in the COR and 8,515 in the MVR group were included. The mean age of patients was 63 years, comprising 72% of male patients. The baseline characteristics of the 2 treatment groups were comparable. On a median follow-up of 1-year, COR was associated with a significantly higher odds of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; OR 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10 to 1.70, p = 0.005), angina (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.83 to 2.85, p <= 0.00001) and revascularization (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.54, p = 0.002) compared with patients undergoing MVR for STEMI. The all-cause mortality (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.53, p = 0.22), cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.72, p = 0.07), rate of heart failure (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.59, p = 0.31), need for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.82 to 2.64, p = 0.19), repeat myocardial infarction (MI) events (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.64, p = 0.15) and risk of stroke (OR 1.27 95% CI 0.68 to 2.34, p = 0.45%) were similar between the two groups. A subgroup analysis based on follow-up duration and study design mostly followed the results of the pooled analysis except that the risk of repeat MI events were significantly lower in the MVR group across RCTs (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.94, p = 0.009). In contrast to the culprit-only approach, MVR in patients with STEMI is associated with a significant reduction in MACE, angina and need for revascularization. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 39
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Bogaty P, 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, V382, P1568, DOI [10.1056/NEJMc2000278, 10.1056/NEJMoa1907775]
  • [2] Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Engstrom, Thomas
    Kelbaek, Henning
    Helqvist, Steffen
    Hofsten, Dan Eik
    Klovgaard, Lene
    Holmvang, Lene
    Jorgensen, Erik
    Pedersen, Frants
    Saunamaki, Kari
    Clemmensen, Peter
    De Backer, Ole
    Ravkilde, Jan
    Tilsted, Hans-Henrik
    Villadsen, Anton Boel
    Aaroe, Jens
    Jensen, Svend Eggert
    Raungaard, Bent
    Kober, Lars
    [J]. LANCET, 2015, 386 (9994) : 665 - 671
  • [3] Early Complete Revascularization in Hemodynamically Stable Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease
    Fortuni, Federico
    Crimi, Gabriele
    Angelini, Filippo
    Leonardi, Sergio
    D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio
    Ferlini, Marco
    Rolando, Marco
    Raisaro, Arturo
    Visconti, Luigi Oltrona
    Ferrario, Maurizio
    Gnecchi, Massimiliano
    De Ferrari, Gaetano M.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 35 (08) : 1047 - 1057
  • [4] Randomized Trial of Complete Versus Lesion-Only Revascularization in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for STEMI and Multivessel Disease
    Gershlick, Anthony H.
    Khan, Jamal Nasir
    Kelly, Damian J.
    Greenwood, John P.
    Sasikaran, Thiagarajah
    Curzen, Nick
    Blackman, Daniel J.
    Dalby, Miles
    Fairbrother, Kathryn L.
    Banya, Winston
    Wang, Duolao
    Flather, Marcus
    Hetherington, Simon L.
    Kelion, Andrew D.
    Talwar, Suneel
    Gunning, Mark
    Hall, Roger
    Swanton, Howard
    McCann, Gerry P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (10) : 963 - 972
  • [5] Treatment of non-culprit lesions detected during primary PCI: long-term follow-up of a randomised clinical trial
    Ghani, A.
    Dambrink, J-H. E.
    van 't Hof, A. W. J.
    Ottervanger, J. P.
    Gosselink, A. T. M.
    Hoorntje, J. C. A.
    [J]. NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2012, 20 (09) : 347 - 353
  • [6] A Randomized Trial of Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Diabetic Patients With Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multi Vessel Disease
    Hamza, Mohamed
    Mahmoud, Ahmed N.
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 29 (03) : 241 - 247
  • [7] Exaggeration of nonculprit stenosis severity during acute myocardial infarction: Implications for immediate multivessel revascularization
    Hanratty, CG
    Koyama, Y
    Rasmussen, HH
    Nelson, GIC
    Hansen, PS
    Ward, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (05) : 911 - 916
  • [8] Hlinomaz O, 2015, EUR HEART J, V36, P825
  • [9] Neumann F-J, ESCEACTS GUIDELINES
  • [10] OGara PT, 2013, Circulation, V127, P362, DOI [10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742c84, 10.1161/CIR.0b013-3182742cf6, DOI 10.1161/CIR.0B013-3182742CF6]