Radiation Doses in Consecutive CT Examinations from Five University of California Medical Centers

被引:100
作者
Smith-Bindman, Rebecca [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Moghadassi, Michelle [1 ]
Wilson, Nicole [1 ]
Nelson, Thomas R. [4 ]
Boone, John M. [5 ]
Cagnon, Christopher H. [7 ]
Gould, Robert [1 ]
Hall, David J. [4 ]
Krishnam, Mayil [8 ]
Lamba, Ramit [5 ]
McNitt-Gray, Michael [7 ]
Seibert, Anthony [5 ]
Miglioretti, Diana L. [6 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Philip R Lee Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Radiol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[6] Univ Calif Davis, Div Biostat, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[8] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Radiol Sci, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[9] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Grp Hlth Res Inst, Seattle, WA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; LENGTH PRODUCT; COUNTRIES; EXPOSURE; AFRICA; EUROPE; ICRP; ASIA;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2015142728
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To summarize data on computed tomographic (CT) radiation doses collected from consecutive CT examinations performed at 12 facilities that can contribute to the creation of reference levels. Materials and Methods: The study was approved by the institutional review boards of the collaborating institutions and was compliant with HIPAA. Radiation dose metrics were prospectively and electronically collected from 199 656 consecutive CT examinations in 83 181 adults and 3871 consecutive CT examinations in 2609 children at the five University of California medical centers during 2013. The median volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP), and effective dose, along with the interquartile range (IQR), were calculated separately for adults and children and stratified according to anatomic region. Distributions for DLP and effective dose are reported for single-phase examinations, multiphase examinations, and all examinations. Results: For adults, the median CTDIvol was 50 mGy (IQR, 37-62 mGy) for the head, 12 mGy (IQR, 7-17 mGy) for the chest, and 12 mGy (IQR, 8-17 mGy) for the abdomen. The median DLPs for single-phase, multiphase, and all examinations, respectively, were as follows: head, 880 mGy.cm (IQR, 640-1120 mGy.cm), 1550 mGy.cm (IQR, 1150-2130 mGy.cm), and 960 mGy.cm (IQR, 690-1300 mGy.cm); chest, 420 mGy.cm (IQR, 260-610 mGy.cm), 880 mGy.cm (IQR, 570-1430 mGy.cm), and 550 mGy.cm (IQR 320-830 mGy.cm); and abdomen, 580 mGy.cm (IQR, 360-860 mGy.cm), 1220 mGy.cm (IQR, 850-1790 mGy.cm), and 960 mGy.cm (IQR, 600-1460 mGy.cm). Median effective doses for single-phase, multiphase, and all examinations, respectively, were as follows: head, 2 mSv (IQR, 1-3 mSv), 4 mSv (IQR, 3-8 mSv), and 2 mSv (IQR, 2-3 mSv); chest, 9 mSv (IQR, 5-13 mSv), 18 mSv (IQR, 12-29 mSv), and 11 mSv (IQR, 6-18 mSv); and abdomen, 10 mSv (IQR, 6-16 mSv), 22 mSv (IQR, 15-32 mSv), and 17 mSv (IQR, 11-26 mSv). In general, values for children were approximately 50% those for adults in the head and 25% those for adults in the chest and abdomen. Conclusion: These summary dose data provide a starting point for institutional evaluation of CT radiation doses. (C) RSNA, 2015
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 141
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography
    Sickles, EA
    Miglioretti, DL
    Ballard-Barbash, R
    Geller, BM
    Leung, JWT
    Rosenberg, RD
    Smith-Bindman, R
    Yankaskas, BC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (03) : 775 - 790
  • [22] Use of Diagnostic Imaging Studies and Associated Radiation Exposure for Patients Enrolled in Large Integrated Health Care Systems, 1996-2010
    Smith-Bindman, Rebecca
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Johnson, Eric
    Lee, Choonsik
    Feigelson, Heather Spencer
    Flynn, Michael
    Greenlee, Robert T.
    Kruger, Randell L.
    Hornbrook, Mark C.
    Roblin, Douglas
    Solberg, Leif I.
    Vanneman, Nicholas
    Weinmann, Sheila
    Williams, Andrew E.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (22): : 2400 - 2409
  • [23] Radiation Dose Associated With Common Computed Tomography Examinations and the Associated Lifetime Attributable Risk of Cancer
    Smith-Bindman, Rebecca
    Lipson, Jafi
    Marcus, Ralph
    Kim, Kwang-Pyo
    Mahesh, Mahadevappa
    Gould, Robert
    de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 169 (22) : 2078 - 2086
  • [24] Stamm G, 2012, RAD DOSE MULTIDETECT, P209
  • [25] Multidetector CT radiation dose optimisation in adults: short- and long-term effects of a clinical audit
    Tack, Denis
    Jahnen, Andreas
    Kohler, Sarah
    Harpes, Nico
    De Maertelaer, Viviane
    Back, Carlo
    Gevenois, Pierre Alain
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (01) : 169 - 175
  • [26] US Food and Drug Administration, IN RED UNN RAD EXP M
  • [27] IAEA survey of paediatric computed tomography practice in 40 countries in Asia, Europe, Latin America and Africa: procedures and protocols
    Vassileva, Jenia
    Rehani, Madan M.
    Applegate, Kimberly
    Ahmed, Nada A.
    Al-Dhuhli, Humoud
    Al-Naemi, Huda M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (03) : 623 - 631
  • [28] CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland
    Verdun, Francis R.
    Gutierrez, Daniel
    Vader, John Paul
    Aroua, Abbas
    Alamo-Maestre, Leonor Trinidad
    Bochud, Francois
    Gudinchet, Francois
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (09) : 1980 - 1986
  • [29] Implementation of DRLs in the UK
    Wall, BF
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) : 183 - 187