Measuring Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships: The Initial Development of an Assessment Instrument

被引:23
作者
Arora, Prerna G. [1 ,2 ]
Krumholz, Lauren S. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Guerra, Terry [6 ,7 ]
Leff, Stephen S. [6 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Pace Univ, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10038 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Div Child & Adolescent Psychiat, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Cambridge Hlth Alliance, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[6] Philadelphia Collaborat Violence Prevent Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[7] ACHIEVEability, Philadelphia, PA USA
[8] Univ Penn, Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Pediat, Div Dev & Behav Pediat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[9] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[10] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Violence Prevent Initiat, Philadelphia, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Community-based participatory research; community-institutional relations; methods; qualitative research; questionnaires; PROGRAMS;
D O I
10.1353/cpr.2015.0077
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Although the partnership between academic researchers and community members is paramount to community-based research efforts, a limited number of measures exist to evaluate this construct. Of those in existence, no assessment measures include a comprehensive coverage of the many dimensions of partnerships. In addition, these measures were not designed through an extensive community-based participatory research (CBPR) model, in which the strengths of traditional assessment techniques were integrated with input from stakeholders. Objectives: The purpose of this article was to describe the creation of a measure to evaluate key dimensions of partnerships forged between researchers and community members using a CBPR approach to measurement development. Methods: The iterative process of developing this measure consisted of integrating valuable feedback from community partners and researchers, via multiple rounds of item sorting and qualitative interviewing. Results: The resultant measure, titled Partnership Assessment In community-based Research (PAIR), consists of 32 items, and comprises 5 dimensions: communication, collaboration, partnership values, benefits, and evaluation. The innovative process of using CBPR in the development of measures, the benefits of this approach, and the lessons learned are highlighted. Conclusions: PAIR was developed out of a need identified jointly by community members and researchers, and is intended to characterize the range of relationships between researchers and community members engaging in community-based research and programming.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 560
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Aiken L.R., 2006, Psychological testing and assessment, V12th
  • [2] Anastasi A., 1997, Psychological testing
  • [3] Becker EA, 2003, GROUP PROCESS EVALUA
  • [4] Bush R., 2002, Community capacity index (version 2)
  • [5] Center for the Advancement of Collaborative Strategies in Health (CACSH), WEB BAS PARTN SELF A
  • [6] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), CDC PREV RES CTR PAR
  • [7] A Systematic Review of Community-Based Participatory Research to Enhance Clinical Trials in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups
    De Las Nueces, Denise
    Hacker, Karen
    DiGirolamo, Ann
    Hicks, LeRoi S.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 47 (03) : 1363 - 1386
  • [8] Survey Design From the Ground Up: Collaboratively Creating the Toronto Teen Survey
    Flicker, Sarah
    Guta, Adrian
    Larkin, June
    Flynn, Susan
    Fridkin, Alycia
    Travers, Robb
    Pole, Jason D.
    Layne, Crystal
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2010, 11 (01) : 112 - 122
  • [9] Hartwig K, DEV SUSTAINING COMMU
  • [10] Developing Measures of Community-Relevant Outcomes for Violence Prevention Programs: A Community-Based Participatory Research Approach to Measurement
    Hausman, Alice J.
    Baker, Courtney N.
    Komaroff, Eugene
    Thomas, Nicole
    Guerra, Terry
    Hohl, Bernadette C.
    Leff, Stephen S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 52 (3-4) : 249 - 262