Ediacaran developmental biology

被引:85
作者
Dunn, Frances S. [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Alexander G. [1 ,3 ]
Donoghue, Philip C. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Earth Sci, Life Sci Bldg,24 Tyndall Ave, Bristol BS8 1TQ, Avon, England
[2] British Geol Survey, Nicker Hill, Nottingham NG12 5GG, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Earth Sci, Downing St, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Metazoa; development; evolution; Ediacaran; Bilateria; Eumetazoa; MISTAKEN POINT ASSEMBLAGE; AVALON PENINSULA; SISTER GROUP; NAMA GROUP; EVOLUTION; FOSSILS; ORIGIN; DICKINSONIA; TAPHONOMY; RANGEOMORPH;
D O I
10.1111/brv.12379
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Rocks of the Ediacaran System (635-541 Ma) preserve fossil evidence of some of the earliest complex macroscopic organisms, many of which have been interpreted as animals. However, the unusual morphologies of some of these organisms have made it difficult to resolve their biological relationships to modern metazoan groups. Alternative competing phylogenetic interpretations have been proposed for Ediacaran taxa, including algae, fungi, lichens, rhizoid protists, and even an extinct higher-order group (Vendobionta). If a metazoan affinity can be demonstrated for these organisms, as advocated by many researchers, they could prove informative in debates concerning the evolution of the metazoan body axis, the making and breaking of axial symmetries, and the appearance of a metameric body plan. Attempts to decipher members of the enigmatic Ediacaran macrobiota have largely involved study of morphology: comparative analysis of their developmental phases has received little attention. Here we present what is known of ontogeny across the three iconic Ediacaran taxa Charnia masoni, Dickinsonia costata and Pteridinium simplex, together with new ontogenetic data and insights. We use these data and interpretations to re-evaluate the phylogenetic position of the broader Ediacaran morphogroups to which these taxa are considered to belong (rangeomorphs, dickinsoniomorphs and erniettomorphs). We conclude, based on the available evidence, that the affinities of the rangeomorphs and the dickinsoniomorphs lie within Metazoa.
引用
收藏
页码:914 / 932
页数:19
相关论文
共 123 条
[1]  
Anderson D.T., 1973, EMBRYOLOGY PHYLOGENY, P93
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, RISE ANIMALS EVOLUTI, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0016756808005645
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1984, DAWN ANIMAL LIFE BIO
[4]   Charnia at 50:: Developmental models for Ediacaran fronds [J].
Antcliffe, Jonathan B. ;
Brasier, Martin D. .
PALAEONTOLOGY, 2008, 51 :11-26
[5]   Charnia and sea pens are poles apart [J].
Antcliffe, Jonathan B. ;
Brasier, Martin D. .
JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 164 :49-51
[6]   Growth and ecology of a multi-branched Ediacaran rangeomorph from the Mistaken Point assemblage, Newfoundland [J].
Bamforth, Emily L. ;
Narbonne, Guy M. ;
Anderson, Michael M. .
JOURNAL OF PALEONTOLOGY, 2008, 82 (04) :763-777
[7]   Principles of branch formation and branch patterning in hydrozoa [J].
Berking, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 50 (2-3) :123-134
[8]   Ediacaran distributions in space and time: testing assemblage concepts of earliest macroscopic body fossils [J].
Boag, Thomas H. ;
Darroch, Simon A. F. ;
Laflamme, Marc .
PALEOBIOLOGY, 2016, 42 (04) :574-594
[9]  
Boardman R. S., 1973, ANIMAL COLONIES DEVE
[10]  
Bonner J.T., 1952, Morphogenesis. An essay on development