Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal

被引:16
作者
Corazza, Gino Roberto [1 ,3 ]
Lenti, Marco Vincenzo [1 ]
Howdle, Peter David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pavia, San Matteo Hosp Fdn, Dept Internal Med 1, Pavia, Italy
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Med, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Fdn IRCCS Policlin San Matteo, Clin Med, Internal Med, Piazzale Golgi 19, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
关键词
Clinical reasoning; Diagnosis; Internal medicine; DECISION-MAKING; STRATEGIES; KNOWLEDGE; ERRORS; BIASES; PHILOSOPHY; CLINICIAN; SCRIPTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11739-020-02580-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The practice of clinical medicine needs to be a very flexible discipline which can adapt promptly to continuously changing surrounding events. Despite the huge advances and progress made in recent decades, clinical reasoning to achieve an accurate diagnosis still seems to be the most appropriate and distinctive feature of clinical medicine. This is particularly evident in internal medicine where diagnostic boundaries are often blurred. Making a diagnosis is a multi-stage process which requires proper data collection, the formulation of an illness script and testing of the diagnostic hypothesis. To make sense of a number of variables, physicians may follow an analytical or an intuitive approach to clinical reasoning, depending on their personal experience and level of professionalism. Intuitive thinking is more typical of experienced physicians, but is not devoid of shortcomings. Particularly, the high risk of biases must be counteracted by de-biasing techniques, which require constant critical thinking. In this review, we discuss critically the current knowledge regarding diagnostic reasoning from an internal medicine perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 279
页数:7
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Teaching clinical reasoning to medical students [J].
Amey, Lisa ;
Donald, Kenneth J. ;
Teodorczuk, Andrew .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2017, 78 (07) :399-401
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, PMUs Problem Analysis of LFPs, DOI DOI 10.4159/HARVARD.9780674189089
[3]   The benefits of flexibility: the pedagogical value of instructions to adopt multifaceted diagnostic reasoning strategies [J].
Ark, Tavinder K. ;
Brooks, Lee R. ;
Eva, Kevin W. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (03) :281-287
[4]   MEDICINE AND THE NATURE OF VERTICAL REASONING [J].
BLOIS, MS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 318 (13) :847-851
[5]   Assessing the semantic content of clinical case presentations: Studies of reliability and concurrent validity [J].
Bordage, G ;
Connell, KJ ;
Chang, RW ;
Gecht, MR ;
Sinacore, JM .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1997, 72 (10) :S37-S39
[6]   ELABORATED KNOWLEDGE - A KEY TO SUCCESSFUL DIAGNOSTIC THINKING [J].
BORDAGE, G .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1994, 69 (11) :883-885
[7]   Medical education: Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning [J].
Bowen, Judith L. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (21) :2217-2225
[8]   How Expert Clinicians Intuitively Recognize a Medical Diagnosis [J].
Brush, John E., Jr. ;
Sherbino, Jonathan ;
Norman, Geoffrey R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 130 (06) :629-634
[9]   Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: Theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research [J].
Charlin, BD ;
Tardif, J ;
Boshuizen, HPA .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (02) :182-190
[10]   Scripts and clinical reasoning [J].
Charlin, Bernard ;
Boshuizen, Henny P. A. ;
Custers, Eugene J. ;
Feltovich, Paul J. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (12) :1178-1184