INCENTIVES FOR PRIVATE INNOVATIONS - IS PUBLIC SUPPORT NECESSARY?

被引:2
作者
Lewczuk, Anna [1 ]
Lewkowicz, Jacek [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Fac Econ Sci, Warsaw, Poland
来源
ARGUMENTA OECONOMICA | 2020年 / 45卷 / 02期
关键词
innovation policy; public support; public policy; institutional economics; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY-RIGHTS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ENDOGENOUS INNOVATION; EMPLOYMENT PROTECTION; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; PATENT PROTECTION; MARKET FAILURE; TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.15611/aoe.2020.2.05
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Do firms really need public support in order to offer product and process innovations? Recent articles and professional reports reflect the importance of public support for private innovations. The issue is actual and relevant both from scientific and practical points of view. Public support for actions aimed at developing crucial innovations is an example of creating institutional incentives for the desired behaviour of firms. The question of public support for innovations is critical for ongoing national and international policies in raising the innovativeness of economies. The main goal of the paper is to review the idea of public support for innovativeness and to verify its effects in European countries empirically, by using simple probit and bivariate probit models. This paper aims to provide a systematic analysis of the problem from an institutional perspective. The results of the analysis contribute to a better understanding of the nature of public spending on private innovations and the outcome of such innovation policies. It is also an added value to the discussion over actual public policies which has been so far inconclusive.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 139
页数:35
相关论文
共 96 条
[31]  
Cecchetti S., 2015, 27 CEPR
[32]   Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries [J].
Chen, Y ;
Puttitanun, T .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2005, 78 (02) :474-493
[33]  
Cingano F, 2010, ECON POLICY, P117
[34]   What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers [J].
D'Este, Pablo ;
Iammarino, Simona ;
Savona, Maria ;
von Tunzelmann, Nick .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (02) :482-488
[35]   Private patent protection in the theory of Schumpeterian growth [J].
Davis, Lewis S. ;
Sener, Fuat .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 56 (07) :1446-1460
[36]   Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australia [J].
Dodgson, Mark ;
Hughes, Alan ;
Foster, John ;
Metcalfe, Stan .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (09) :1145-1156
[37]   Openness, productivity and growth: What do we really know? [J].
Edwards, S .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1998, 108 (447) :383-398
[38]  
European Commission, 2014, STUD R D TAX INC
[39]  
Eurostat, 2012, COMM INN SURV
[40]   A TECHNOLOGY GAP APPROACH TO WHY GROWTH-RATES DIFFER [J].
FAGERBERG, J .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1987, 16 (2-4) :87-99