Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study

被引:14
作者
Liao, Chiung-Ling [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Ming-Yung [3 ]
Tyan, Yeu-Sheng [4 ,5 ]
Kok, Lai-Fong [6 ]
Wu, Tina S. [7 ]
Koo, Chiew-Loon [8 ]
Wang, Po-Hui [2 ]
Chao, Kuan-Chong [9 ,10 ]
Han, Chih-Ping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chung Shan Med Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] Chung Shan Med Univ, Inst Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Chung Shan Med Univ Hosp, Clin Trial Ctr, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] Chung Shan Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Taichung, Taiwan
[5] Chung Shan Med Univ, Dept Med Imaging & Radiol Sci, Taichung, Taiwan
[6] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Taichung, Taiwan
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[8] Chung Shan Med Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Taichung, Taiwan
[9] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Taipei, Taiwan
[10] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Fac Med, Div Obstet & Gynecol, Taipei 112, Taiwan
来源
JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE | 2009年 / 7卷
关键词
GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMORS; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; BREAST-CANCER; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; EXPRESSION; DISTINCTION; P16(INK4A); OVEREXPRESSION; QUANTIFICATION; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1186/1479-5876-7-37
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: Endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECA) and endometrial adenocarcinomas (EMA) are uterine malignancies that have differing biological behaviors. The choice of an appropriate therapeutic plan rests on the tumor's site of origin. In this study, we propose to evaluate whether PR adds value to the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel in distinguishing between primary ECA and EMA. Methods: A tissue microarray was constructed using paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissues from 38 hysterectomy specimens, including 14 ECA and 24 EMA. Tissue microarray (TMA) sections were immunostained with 4 antibodies, using the avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method for antigen visualization. The staining intensity and extent of the immunohistochemical (IHC) reactions were appraised using a semi-quantitative scoring system. Results: The three markers (ER, Vim and CEA) and their respective panel expressions showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) frequency differences between ECA and EMA tumors. Although the additional ancillary PR-marker also revealed a significant frequency difference ( p < 0.05) between ECA and EMA tumors, it did not demonstrate any supplementary benefit to the 3-marker panel. Conclusion: According to our data, when histomorphological and clinical doubt exists as to the primary site of origin, we recommend that the conventional 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel is easier, sufficient and appropriate to use in distinguishing between primary ECA and EMA. Although the 4-marker panel containing PR also reveals statistically significant results, the PR-marker offers no supplemental benefit to the pre-existing 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel in the diagnostic distinction between ECA and EMA.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] A panel of immunohistochemical stains, including carcinoembryonic antigen, vimentin, and estrogen receptor, aids the distinction between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas
    McCluggage, WG
    Sumathi, VP
    McBride, HA
    Patterson, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2002, 21 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [2] Adding the p16INK4a Marker to the Traditional 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) Panel Engenders No Supplemental Benefit in Distinguishing Between Primary Endocervical and Endometrial Adenocarcinomas in a Tissue Microarray Study
    Han, Chih-Ping
    Lee, Ming-Yung
    Kok, Lai-Fong
    Ruan, Alexandra
    Wu, Tina S.
    Cheng, Ya-Wen
    Tyan, Yeu-Sheng
    Lin, Ching-Yi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2009, 28 (05) : 489 - 496
  • [3] Ancillary p16INK4a adds no meaningful value to the performance of ER/PR/Vim/CEA panel in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study
    Yao, Chung-Chin
    Kok, Lai-Fong
    Lee, Ming-Yung
    Wang, Po-Hui
    Wu, Tina S.
    Tyan, Yeu-Sheng
    Cheng, Ya-Wen
    Kung, Mei-Fen
    Han, Chih-Ping
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2009, 280 (03) : 405 - 413
  • [4] Ancillary p16INK4a adds no meaningful value to the performance of ER/PR/Vim/CEA panel in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study
    Chung-Chin Yao
    Lai-Fong Kok
    Ming-Yung Lee
    Po-Hui Wang
    Tina S. Wu
    Yeu-Sheng Tyan
    Ya-Wen Cheng
    Mei-Fen Kung
    Chih-Ping Han
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2009, 280 : 405 - 413