Evaluation of membrane fouling mechanism in various membrane pretreatment processes

被引:0
作者
Jung, C. W. [1 ]
Son, H. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ulsan Reg Innovat Agcy, Ulsan, South Korea
[2] Busan Water Qual Inst, Kimhae 621813, South Korea
关键词
NOM; Membrane fouling; Coagulation; MIEX (R); Pretreatment; NATURAL ORGANIC-MATTER; ULTRAFILTRATION; FILTRATION; REMOVAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Pretreatment of organic matter with coagulation and MIEX (R) was evaluated using bench-scale experimental procedures on NOM to determine its effect on subsequent UF or MF membrane filtration. Moreover, this work determines the membrane fouling mechanisms according to membrane pretreatment conditions. When applying the MIEX (R) process as a pretreatment, flux decline was significantly higher than that of the coagulation process. The flux decline Curves for MF membranes are very different from the curves for UF membranes presented earlier. It is very interesting that while the MIEX (R)-UF process shows much higher removal of DOC than that of coagulation, the rate of flux decline was significantly greater. In addition, when comparing coagulation with MTEX (R), coagulation caused a lower rate of flux decline for both hydrophilic and hydrophobic membranes due to enhanced formation of flocs. The permeate flux rapidly declined due to simultaneous pore blocking and cake formation. Also, the permeate flux declined with decreasing internal pore size resulting from particle deposition into the membrane pore. In addition, the experimental results prove that the MIEX (R) and coagulation pretreatment significantly reduced the fouling of the membrane. Especially, the combination of MIEX (R)+coagulation pretreatment significantly reduced membrane fouling. Consequently, applying a pretreatment process before UF was found to be very effective in fouling reduction as well as critical flux increase.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 202
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
AMY G, 1999, REMOVAL HUMIC SUBSTA, P141
[2]  
[Anonymous], UNIT OPERATION CHEM
[3]   Ultrafiltration of natural organic matter [J].
Aoustin, E ;
Schäfer, AI ;
Fane, AG ;
Waite, TD .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 22-3 (1-3) :63-78
[4]  
CADEE K, 2000, P AWWA C DENV US
[5]   Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane [J].
Cho, J ;
Amy, G ;
Pellegrino, J .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2000, 164 (1-2) :89-110
[6]  
HERMIA J, 1982, T I CHEM ENG-LOND, V60, P183
[7]   Application of combined coagulation-ultrafiltration membrane process for water treatment [J].
Jung, CW ;
Kang, LS .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 20 (05) :855-861
[8]   Water treatment using MIEX®DOC/ultrafiltration process [J].
Kabsch-Korbutowicz, Malgorzata ;
Majewska-Nowak, Katarzyna ;
Winnicki, Tomasz .
DESALINATION, 2008, 221 (1-3) :338-344
[9]  
Kaiya Y, 1996, DESALINATION, V106, P71, DOI 10.1016/0011-9164(96)00094-X
[10]   Surfactant removal from water solutions by means of ultrafiltration and ion-exchange [J].
Kowalska, Izabela .
DESALINATION, 2008, 221 (1-3) :351-357