Ankle work and dynamic joint stiffness in high- compared to low-arched athletes during a barefoot running task

被引:32
作者
Powell, Douglas W. [1 ]
Williams, D. S. Blaise, III [2 ]
Windsor, Brett [1 ]
Butler, Robert J. [3 ]
Zhang, Songning [4 ]
机构
[1] Campbell Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Buies Creek, NC 27506 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Duke Univ, Doctor Phys Therapy Div, Durham, NC USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Dept Kinesiol Recreat & Sport Studies, Knoxville, TN USA
关键词
Running; Barefoot; Kinetics; Injury; Ankle; Arch; Foot; GENDER; FOOT; RUNNERS; MECHANICS; WALKING; PATTERNS; MOMENT; INJURY; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.humov.2014.01.007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
High- (HA) and low-arched (LA) athletes have an exaggerated risk of injury. Ankle joint stiffness is a potential underlying mechanism for the greater rate of injury within these two functionally different groups. An alternative candidate mechanism of injury in HA and LA athletes pertains to the efficacy of the foot as a rigid lever during propulsion. The purpose of this study was to quantify the differences in ankle dynamic joint stiffness, and ankle braking work and ankle propulsive work during stance phase of running. Methods: Ten HA and ten LA athletes performed five barefoot running trials while ground reaction forces and three-dimensional kinematics were recorded. Ankle dynamic joint stiffness was calculated as the slope of the ankle joint moment ankle joint angle plot during load attenuation. Ankle braking and propulsive work values were calculated for the stance phase. Results: HA athletes had significantly greater ankle dynamic joint stiffness and significantly smaller ankle net and propulsive work than IA athletes. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that HA and LA athletes exhibit unique biomechanical patterns during running. These patterns may be related to lower extremity injury. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 156
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Lower extremity stiffness: implications for performance and injury [J].
Butler, RJ ;
Crowell, HP ;
Davis, IM .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2003, 18 (06) :511-517
[2]   Interaction of arch type and footwear on running mechanics [J].
Butler, Robert J. ;
Davis, Irene S. ;
Hamill, Joseph .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (12) :1998-2005
[3]   Dynamics of the ankle joint analyzed through moment-angle loops during human walking: Gender and age effects [J].
Crenna, Paolo ;
Frigo, Carlo .
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 30 (06) :1185-1198
[4]   Muscles do more positive than negative work in human locomotion [J].
DeVita, Paul ;
Helseth, Joseph ;
Hortobagyi, Tibor .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 210 (19) :3361-3373
[5]   Dynamic joint stiffness of the ankle during walking: Gender-related differences [J].
Gabriel, Ronaldo C. ;
Abrantes, Joao ;
Granata, Kevin ;
Bulas-Cruz, Jose ;
Melo-Pinto, Pedro ;
Filipe, Vitor .
PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2008, 9 (01) :16-24
[6]   Effects of Step Rate Manipulation on Joint Mechanics during Running [J].
Heiderscheit, Bryan C. ;
Chumanov, Elizabeth S. ;
Michalski, Max P. ;
Wille, Christa M. ;
Ryan, Michael B. .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2011, 43 (02) :296-302
[7]   Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking [J].
Hunt, AE ;
Smith, RM .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2004, 19 (04) :391-397
[8]   The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries [J].
Kaufman, KR ;
Brodine, SK ;
Shaffer, RA ;
Johnson, CW ;
Cullison, TR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (05) :585-593
[9]   Gender differences in frontal and sagittal plane biomechanics during drop landings [J].
Kernozek, TW ;
Torry, MR ;
Van Hoof, H ;
Cowley, H ;
Tanner, S .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2005, 37 (06) :1003-1012
[10]  
Lamontagne A, 2000, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V81, P351, DOI 10.1053/apmr.2000.0810351