A narrative literature review process for an academic business research thesis

被引:34
作者
Juntunen, Mari [1 ]
Lehenkari, Mirjam [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Dept Mkt Management & Int Business, Oulu, Finland
[2] Univ Oulu, Dept Econ Accounting & Finance, Oulu, Finland
关键词
Process theory; narrative literature review; systematic literature review; bachelor's thesis; qualitative research; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1080/03075079.2019.1630813
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research on the systematic literature review process is extensive, but a justified explanation of how a narrative literature review process progresses remains absent from the existing literature. The purpose of this study is to increase understanding about the narrative literature review process. By building on process theory and the literature on systematic literature reviews and by empirically examining the literature review processes for bachelor's theses in a European business school, we reveal that a narrative literature process is iterative, non-structured and multi-layered; contains several cumulative written outcomes; and is embedded in a social context wherein various official and non-official actors guide and support the beginning researcher. This study is a fresh attempt to explain the progress of a literature review process with help of process theory, thereby offering novel insights into the research on literature reviews in general and on narrative literature reviews across various fields of human sciences specifically.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 342
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, INFORM SCI INT J EME, DOI DOI 10.28945/479
[2]   Systematic review methodology in higher education [J].
Bearman, Margaret ;
Smith, Calvin D. ;
Carbone, Angela ;
Slade, Susan ;
Baik, Chi ;
Hughes-Warrington, Marnie ;
Neumann, David L. .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 31 (05) :625-640
[3]   THE SIGNIFICANCE OF DISCIPLINARY DIFFERENCES [J].
BECHER, T .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1994, 19 (02) :151-161
[4]   Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain [J].
Brereton, Pearl ;
Kitchenham, Barbara A. ;
Budgen, David ;
Turner, Mark ;
Khalil, Mohamed .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2007, 80 (04) :571-583
[5]   Challenges confronting beginning researchers in conducting literature reviews [J].
Chen, Der-Thanq Victor ;
Wang, Yu-Mei ;
Lee, Wei Ching .
STUDIES IN CONTINUING EDUCATION, 2016, 38 (01) :47-60
[6]   Alternative approaches for studying organizational change [J].
de Ven, AHV ;
Poole, MS .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2005, 26 (09) :1377-1404
[7]   A NEW PARADIGM FOR SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEWS IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT [J].
Durach, Christian F. ;
Kembro, Joakim ;
Wieland, Andreas .
JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2017, 53 (04) :67-85
[8]   THE GROUP INTERVIEW [J].
Edmiston, Vivian .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1944, 37 (08) :593-601
[9]  
Ferrari R., 2015, Review of General Psychology, V24, P230, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311, DOI 10.1037//1089-2680.1.3.311]
[10]   THE GROUP INTERVIEW IN SOCIAL-RESEARCH [J].
FREY, JH ;
FONTANA, A .
SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 1991, 28 (02) :175-187