Risk Assessment of Storm Sewers in Urban Areas Using Fuzzy Technique and Monte Carlo Simulation

被引:3
作者
Rezazadeh Baghal, Siamak [1 ]
Khodashenas, Saeed Reza [2 ]
机构
[1] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Dept Water Engn, POB 918617-3734, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
[2] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Dept Water Engn, POB 917966-6549, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
关键词
Fuzzy number; Monte Carlo simulation (MCS); Risk analysis; Storm sewer; Random variable; FLOOD RISK; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; DRAINAGE; SYSTEMS; MODEL; DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001696
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
In the task of storm sewer design, the accuracy of the method of choice for estimating the risk value is not a trivial task, because it improves the safety and effectiveness of the entire system. Hence, two methods for risk assessment of a storm sewer in an urban area are presented here. The first method is fuzzy risk analysis, in which uncertainty parameters are treated as fuzzy numbers. To do so, a novel formula to calculate the fuzzy risk of sewer flooding with the aim of implementing the alpha-cut principle when runoff and the Manning roughness coefficients are the only uncertainty parameters, is introduced here. The fuzzy number represents the runoff coefficient obtained from the data from seven rainfall events recorded in an experimental urban catchment. In the second method, the fuzzy numbers are replaced with various associated probability distributions, in which all the possible combinations are considered. Then, the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) technique calculates the corresponding probabilistic risk of flooding. It is observed that computing the limit values of the MCS produces an interval that closely tracks values of the calculated risk using the fuzzy technique. This means that the fuzzy alpha-cut and MCS methods provide similar results and indicate that the fuzzy method for storm sewer risk assessment has acceptable accuracy (more than 97%). But, the representation of uncertainty and the computation time is different in these methods. Hence, the superiority of one method over another depends on the nature of the problem.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Spatial and temporal analysis of urban flood risk assessment [J].
Ahmad, Shohan S. ;
Simonovic, Slobodan P. .
URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2013, 10 (01) :26-49
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, P 4 INT C HYDR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ISO 31000 risk management-guidelines
[4]   Evaluation of drought events in various climatic conditions using data-driven models and a reliability-based probabilistic model [J].
Barzkar, Ali ;
Najafzadeh, Mohammad ;
Homaei, Farshad .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2022, 110 (03) :1931-1952
[5]   Random characteristics of runoff coefficient in urban catchments [J].
Becciu, G ;
Paoletti, A .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 36 (8-9) :39-44
[6]   Resilience in urban drainage risk management systems [J].
Birgani, Yaser Tahmasebi ;
Yazdandoost, Farhad .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-WATER MANAGEMENT, 2016, 169 (01) :3-16
[7]  
Bogardi I., 1996, RISK BASED DECISION, VVII, P401
[8]  
Brown F.B., 2010, LAUR1005634 LOS AL N
[9]   Urban flood risk assessment using sewer flooding databases [J].
Caradot, Nicolas ;
Granger, Damien ;
Chapgier, Jean ;
Cherqui, Frederic ;
Chocat, Bernard .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) :832-840
[10]   A novel intuitionistic fuzzy C means clustering algorithm and its application to medical images [J].
Chaira, Tamalika .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2011, 11 (02) :1711-1717